【24h】

OPTIMIZED RESTRAINT SYSTEMS FOR REAR SEAT PASSENGERS

机译:后排乘客的优化约束系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Restraint systems for front seats have experienced continual improvement in recent years, in particular through the introduction of airbags. The standard for rear seats, however, is still the conventional three-point belt on outer seats and the lap belt for the middle seat position. As using airbags in rear seats is very problematic, the feasibility and protective effect will be examined of a belt system equipped with a belt pretensioner and a load limiter. To do so, first the marginal conditions constituted by legislation, findings from accident investigations, and seat position and belt geometry in rear seats will all be discussed in detail. Results from sled testing and MADYMO simulations allow the following to be said: Optimized belt systems very much reduce thorax loading, the largest effect for chest deflection coming from the load limiter, but for V*C, on the other hand, from the pretensioner. It emerges that a vehicle crash pulse that is 30% harder with an optimized belt system produces lower thorax loading values for rear seat occupants than a corresponding "softer" pulse with a conventional three-point belt.
机译:近年来,特别是通过引入安全气囊,前排座椅约束系统得到了持续改进。但是,后排座椅的标准仍然是外侧座椅的传统三点式安全带和中间座椅位置的腰带。由于在后排座椅中使用安全气囊存在很大问题,因此将对配备有安全带预紧器和载荷限制器的安全带系统的可行性和保护效果进行研究。为此,首先将详细讨论立法规定的边际条件,事故调查的结果以及后座的座椅位置和安全带几何形状。橇测试和MADYMO模拟的结果可以说是:优化的皮带系统可以极大地减少胸部负荷,这对胸部挠曲的最大影响来自负荷限制器,而对于V * C,则来自预紧器。结果表明,与传统的三点式安全带相应的“较软”的脉冲相比,使用优化的安全带系统硬的车辆碰撞脉冲对后排乘客产生的胸部负荷值更低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号