• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>2019 1st IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies and Systems >An analysis of Industry’s perspective and determinants influencing elasticity of electricity demand in context of cross subsidy in India: Taking case of Rajasthan and Haryana states
【24h】

An analysis of Industry’s perspective and determinants influencing elasticity of electricity demand in context of cross subsidy in India: Taking case of Rajasthan and Haryana states

机译：在印度交叉补贴的背景下，行业对影响电力需求弹性的观点和决定因素进行了分析：以拉贾斯坦邦和哈里亚纳邦为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper makes an effort to present the factors which could influence cross-subsidy elasticity of electricity demand and provides an assessment of industry perspective towards the cross-subsidy structure in electricity tariff in India. For the same, 38 no of industries from States Rajasthan and Haryana were surveyed. After analysis of collected data from the survey, paper concludes that though some industries have shifted partially to other power supply options, there are still a significant number of industries which are dissatisfied but have not moved away from utilities due to combination of factors such as cross subsidy surcharge, high capex requirement for setting up captive power plant, high cost of power generation, and hurdles in getting open access. However, these industries could be “at risk” category for the utilities as they could potential migrate if some of these factors get relaxed in the near future. Furthermore, this paper finds that there are some industries which are not even aware of other power supply options and could be in the “at risk” category. This paper suggests that as industries are high revenue consumers, utility and policymaker should consider all ill effects of cross-subsidy structure on utilities while drafting tariff policies.
机译：本文试图介绍可能影响电力需求交叉补贴弹性的因素，并提供行业观点，以评估印度电价的交叉补贴结构。同样，没有调查来自拉贾斯坦邦和哈里亚纳邦的38个行业。在对调查收集的数据进行分析之后，论文得出的结论是，尽管一些行业已部分转移到其他电源选项，但由于诸如跨行业等多种因素的结合，仍然有相当多的行业不满意但并未脱离公用事业补贴附加费，建立自备电厂的高资本支出要求，高昂的发电成本以及开放接入的障碍。但是，这些行业可能会成为公用事业的“风险”类别，因为如果其中一些因素在不久的将来得到放松，它们可能会迁移。此外，本文发现有些行业甚至不知道其他电源选项，并且可能属于“处于危险中”类别。本文建议，由于行业是高收入消费者，公用事业和政策制定者应在起草关税政策时考虑交叉补贴结构对公用事业的所有不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号