• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>2014 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries >Articles, papers, chapters, theses - who wins the visibility wars?
【24h】

Articles, papers, chapters, theses - who wins the visibility wars?

机译：文章，论文，章节，论文-谁赢得了知名度大战？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Researchers need access to previous research to base their own work on. Some of the most commonly referenced materials are published in the form of journal articles, conference papers, books and book chapters, and research theses. The purpose of this research was to determine how these four categories of documents compare in terms of visibility to search engine crawlers. A questionnaire was used to gather data from international scholars on their completed research. Three types of queries were generated and over 3000 Web sites were inspected to determine the visibility of these outputs. Search engine result pages were inspected, and the rankings of the research documents were recorded and converted to a scoring system. The results have indicated that the four types of outputs enjoy varying degrees of exposure to search engines, with journal articles leading the way, and books/book chapters having the smallest degree of exposure to search engines. Some query types also produced better results than others. It was concluded that journal articles provide the best way to expose research work to Internet searchers through search engines.
机译：研究人员需要获得以前的研究成果才能建立自己的工作基础。一些最常参考的材料以期刊文章，会议论文，书籍和书籍章节以及研究论文的形式出版。这项研究的目的是确定如何比较这四类文档对搜索引擎搜寻器的可见性。问卷用于从国际学者那里收集有关他们完成的研究的数据。生成了三种类型的查询，并检查了3000多个网站，以确定这些输出的可见性。检查了搜索引擎结果页，记录了研究文件的排名并将其转换为评分系统。结果表明，四种类型的输出在搜索引擎中的暴露程度不同，期刊文章处于领先地位，而书籍/书籍章节在搜索引擎中的暴露程度最小。某些查询类型也产生了比其他查询更好的结果。结论是，期刊文章提供了通过搜索引擎向Internet搜索者公开研究工作的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号