首页> 外文会议>2014 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries >A comparative analysis of disciplinary data management workflows
【24h】

A comparative analysis of disciplinary data management workflows

机译:学科数据管理工作流程的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Datasets are now an integral part of scholarly communication. The result is that research data has now become a reality in library and information science, and its curation requires dedicated workflows. Here, we compare two disciplinary examples from High-Energy Physics and Humanities and Social Sciences, both referenced to the OAIS conceptual model. Even though we know that the research datasets and their metadata (preparation and curation) are very different in both disciplines, it can be seen that the conceptual workflow models are very similar, including the assignment of persistent identifiers (PIDs). The latter is particularly interesting when discussing the design and implementation of transdisciplinary services in library and information science.
机译:数据集现在已成为学术交流不可或缺的一部分。结果是研究数据现在已成为图书馆和信息科学中的现实,其管理需要专门的工作流程。在这里,我们比较了高能物理和人文社会科学的两个学科实例,它们都引用了OAIS概念模型。即使我们知道研究数据集及其元数据(准备和管理)在两个学科中都大不相同,但可以看出,概念性工作流模型非常相似,包括持久性标识符(PID)的分配。当讨论图书馆和信息科学领域的跨学科服务的设计和实现时,后者特别有趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号