• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>26th Annual Landfill Gas Symposium Mar 24-27, 2003 Tampa, Florida >BANKING ON THE GREEN POWER PREMIUM; AN INVESTOR'S PERSPECTIVE
【24h】

BANKING ON THE GREEN POWER PREMIUM; AN INVESTOR'S PERSPECTIVE

机译：银行绿色电力溢价；投资者的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In discussing the current state of Green Power Premiums ("GPP" or "GPP's") in the United States, it is important to take a look back to the origins of GPP's, what was the impetus for their development and what impact did they have on the development of Green Power in this country. The first of these GPP's were established as a result of the passage of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act ("PURPA") of 1979, where Congress, in response to the energy crisis of the early 1970's, passed PURPA which was designed to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil supplies by stimulating the development and construction of Qualifying Facilities ("QF's). PURPA, for the first time, required regulated utilities to purchase all the output from these independently owned (not utility owned) QF's at rates not less than the utility's own cost of produce (or acquire) the same amount of power (the "Avoided Cost"). PURPA sought to induce independent power producers ("IPP's") to develop both more efficient power plants, that produced both thermal and electrical power (Cogeneration Facilities "CGF"), and renewable power facilities (Small Power Production Facilities "SMPF").
机译：在讨论美国绿色动力溢价（“ GPP”或“ GPP”）的当前状态时，重要的是回顾一下GPP的起源，推动其发展的动力以及它们产生的影响关于该国绿色能源的发展。这些GPP的第一个是1979年通过的《公共事业管理政策法》（“ PURPA”）建立的，当时国会针对1970年代初期的能源危机通过了旨在减少美国排放量的PURPA。 PURPA首次要求受监管的公用事业公司从这些独立拥有的（非公用事业公司拥有的）QF公司购买所有石油的产出，并通过刺激合格设施（“ QF's”）的开发来建设对外国石油供应的依赖。公用事业公司自己生产（或获得）相同量电力的成本（“避免成本”）。PURPA试图诱使独立的电力生产商（“ IPP”）发展效率更高的发电厂，既生产火力又生产电力（热电联产设施“ CGF”）和可再生能源设施（小型发电设施“ SMPF”）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号