• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>2nd international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance 2008 >Social Electronic Governance: Re-Visiting the Redistribution Question through Coordinating Relations between Electronic Governance and Social Goals
【24h】

Social Electronic Governance: Re-Visiting the Redistribution Question through Coordinating Relations between Electronic Governance and Social Goals

机译：社会电子治理：通过协调电子治理与社会目标之间的关系重新审视再分配问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Historically, development theories have recognized the significance of technology for development. The post World War II decades were treated with arguments that utilized pro-technology thinking as a kind of missing link in the then development agenda. However, the rise of neo -classical school from the 1980's onwards has altered the technology-development landscape, by introducing untraditional sets of institutional relations-in particular, reduction of the state, expansion of markets and generally curtailing the civil society. Electronic governance has ascended the world stage from within the neo-classical order. The implications being that market systems define the rules of the game as far as e-Governance operations are concerned. Inevitably, the expansive power allocated tcy markets by the neo-classical order has generated different forms of regulation, aimed at addressing social polarization. The need for regulation has long been advocated for, by Keynesian and other renowned theorists.rnBy interrogating these sorts of issues, this paper established that e-Governance negotiates poorly with social goals in particular forms of regimes. In details, the study found that market economies with high levels of e-Governance registers high inequality levels, while mixed or social democracies on medium levels of e-Governance record better trends of social equality. Many developing countries fall under market economies, not by choice, but largely due to dysfunctional bureaucracies. The argument being that when bureaucracies dysfunction, market systems naturally take charge.rnOn the above account, the study proposed that e-Governance could operate far better in social terms, if it is compartmentalized. It also suggested that e-Governance target human development initiatives at earlier rather than late stages.
机译：从历史上看，发展理论已经认识到技术对发展的重要性。第二次世界大战后的几十年间，人们争论不休，这些争论利用了亲技术思维，将其视为当时发展议程中的一种缺失环节。但是，从1980年代开始，新古典主义学校的兴起改变了技术发展的局面，引入了非传统的制度关系，特别是国家的减少，市场的扩大以及普遍地限制了公民社会。电子治理已从新古典秩序内部跃升为世界舞台。其含义是，就电子政务运营而言，市场系统定义了游戏规则。不可避免地，新古典秩序在市场上分配的扩张力量产生了旨在解决社会两极分化的不同形式的监管。凯恩斯主义和其他著名理论家长期以来一直主张监管的必要性。通过审视这类问题，本文确定了电子政务与特定形式政体的社会目标之间的谈判不力。详细地，该研究发现，电子政务水平高的市场经济体的不平等程度很高，而电子政务水平中等的混合民主或社会民主国家则表现出更好的社会平等趋势。许多发展中国家属于市场经济国家，不是出于选择，而是很大程度上由于官僚机构失灵。有论据认为，当官僚机构失灵时，市场体系自然会负责。鉴于上述原因，研究提出，如果将电子政务分隔开来，它的社会作用会更好。它还建议电子政务的目标是在早期而不是后期发展人类发展计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号