• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>31st annual national conference of the American Society for Engineering Management 2010 >RE-ENGINEERING THE CONCEPT OF 'GOVERNANCE': SOME CRITERIA FOR THEORIZING AND PRACTICE
【24h】

RE-ENGINEERING THE CONCEPT OF 'GOVERNANCE': SOME CRITERIA FOR THEORIZING AND PRACTICE

机译：重新设计“治理”的概念：理论和实践的一些标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Governance is increasingly becoming a buzzword that frequents many widescale engineering initiatives. Each, however, draw on diverse interpretations of the same word. Despite the conceptual ambiguity, the very idea of governance is still considered very useful and valuable. This paper discusses some of the promising explanatory and normative conceptual notions of "governance" and argues for a set of criteria by which these various accounts can be evaluated. The argued criteria set is based on higher level philosophical, axiomatic, axiological and methodological considerations and narrowed down into ontological, theoretical, and pragmatic broad criteria categories. Each of these broad categories is presented after which they will be used as a basis to constructively evaluate existing governance theories, models and frameworks. Finally, the paper hints on a systemically developed "governance" paradigm that is internally aligned with the earlier mentioned criteria aimed to assist in developing a wider and more consistent "governance" research agenda.
机译：治理越来越成为流行词，经常出现许多大规模的工程计划。但是，每一个都使用相同单词的不同解释。尽管在概念上存在歧义，但治理的想法仍然被认为非常有用和有价值。本文讨论了一些关于“治理”的有希望的解释性和规范性概念，并提出了一套可以评估这些不同账目的标准。有争议的标准集基于更高层次的哲学，公理，价值论和方法论方面的考虑，并缩小到本体论，理论和务实的广泛标准类别。将介绍这些广泛的类别中的每一个类别，然后将它们用作对现有治理理论，模型和框架进行建设性评估的基础。最后，本文暗示了系统开发的“治理”范式，该范式在内部与前面提到的标准一致，旨在帮助制定更广泛，更一致的“治理”研究议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号