• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>4th International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods Mar 20-22, 2002 Melbourne, Australia >PERFORMANCE SYSTEM MODEL ―A FRAMEWORK FOR DESCRIBING THE TOTALITY OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE
【24h】

PERFORMANCE SYSTEM MODEL ―A FRAMEWORK FOR DESCRIBING THE TOTALITY OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE

机译：绩效系统模型―描述建筑绩效的总体框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This model is the next step forward in the evolution in the performance of buildings. The Performance System Model (PSM) is now officially introduced. This model is the result of a combination of the NKB model with a risk/performance levels by Brian Meacham~(xvi) and the IRCC. It is hoped that this introduction will lead to a better communication tool to those involved with both performance based building regulations but also with performance based design in general. Also, this model clearly points out a problem with general references of criteria, verification methods and associated standards from one regulatory system to another and from one project to another. It is hoped that this model and an explanation of these discrepancies will provide direction for standard development in the future Additionally looking at the full spectrum of performance from the basic regulatory minimums to the area of client of expectations shows how performance regulations are simply one aspect and the applicability of the model to all areas of design. This understanding should provide more insight to disciplines such as structural engineering and fire protection engineering related to regulatory minimums. Such design disciplines in many ways have-had the primary focus on regulatory minimums for compliance without a greater understanding of the overall level of performance and how such design should look deeper than minimum compliance. In exploring both the regulatory and non-regulatory issues different approaches were presented. In the regulatory environment there is a push to compare directly to technical performance criteria to show that the goals/objectives are met. Whereas in the non-regulatory arena, the use of scales to indicate the serviceability (performance over time) are used. The scales are a relative measure of performance where the technical performance criteria tend to provide a more specific independent indication of performance.
机译：该模型是建筑物性能发展的下一步。现在正式引入了性能系统模型（PSM）。该模型是NKB模型与Brian Meacham〜（xvi）和IRCC组合的风险/绩效水平的结果。希望这种介绍将为与基于性能的建筑法规以及总体上基于性能的设计相关的人员提供更好的通信工具。而且，该模型清楚地指出了标准，验证方法和相关标准的通用引用从一个监管系统到另一个，以及从一个项目到另一个项目的问题。希望这种模型和对这些差异的解释将为将来的标准制定提供指导。此外，从基本的最低监管要求到期望的客户领域，全面考察绩效表现，可以发现绩效法规仅仅是一个方面，模型在设计的所有领域的适用性。这种理解应该为与法规最低限度相关的学科（例如结构工程和消防工程）提供更多见识。在许多方面，此类设计学科一直将重点放在法规遵从性最低标准上，而没有对整体性能水平以及如何使此类设计看起来比最低法规遵从性更深刻地了解。在探讨监管和非监管问题时，提出了不同的方法。在监管环境中，有一种要求直接与技术性能标准进行比较，以表明达到了目标。而在非监管领域，则使用标尺来表示可维护性（随时间推移的性能）。量表是性能的相对量度，其中技术性能标准倾向于提供更具体的性能独立指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号