• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>4th International Symposium on Bioelectronics and Bioinformatics >Randomized controlled trial comparing of analgesic effectiveness of TPRF and TENs in clinical and endocrinological changes for chronic shoulder pain
【24h】

Randomized controlled trial comparing of analgesic effectiveness of TPRF and TENs in clinical and endocrinological changes for chronic shoulder pain

机译：TPRF和TENs对慢性肩痛的临床和内分泌变化镇痛效果的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Electrical stimulation is a component of many pain relief modalities. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a simple, low risk, outpatient treatment. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is an effective method for pain relief. Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency (TPRF) combines the advantages of TENS and PRF for treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study is an evidence-based comparison that evaluated the pain scores and endocrinological changes of both TENS and TPRF. Thirty-three patients randomly selected from 61 screened patients were diagnosed with chronic shoulder pain. These patients were randomly distributed into two groups, with the first group receiving TENS treatment and the second group receiving TPRF treatment. Both TENS and PRF groups underwent 15 min of therapeutic intervention per session and three sessions over 1 week. Patients' pain scores were recorded before and after each session. Blood samples were taken for cortisol measurement before and after the treatment week and pain level was assessed. After each session, pain was reduced on the visual analog scale in both TENS (Group I) and TPRF (Group II) groups. After a 1-week therapy, TPRF group demonstrated a significantly better outcome with regard to the self-assessment pain relief (47.81% improvement) and TENS group reduction (19.1% improvement). Therefore, TPRF appeared to be more useful than TENS for short-term decrease of chronic shoulder pain.
机译：电刺激是许多止痛方式的组成部分。经皮电神经刺激（TENS）是一种简单，低风险的门诊治疗。脉冲射频（PRF）是缓解疼痛的有效方法。经皮脉冲射频（TPRF）结合了TENS和PRF的优势，可治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛。这项研究是一项基于证据的比较，评估了TENS和TPRF的疼痛评分和内分泌学变化。从61例筛查患者中随机选择的33例患者被诊断出患有慢性肩痛。这些患者被随机分为两组，第一组接受TENS治疗，第二组接受TPRF治疗。 TENS和PRF组每疗程进行15分钟的治疗干预，并在1周内进行3疗程。在每次治疗前后记录患者的疼痛评分。在治疗周前后采集血样进行皮质醇测定，并评估疼痛程度。每次疗程结束后，TENS（I组）和TPRF（II组）组的视觉模拟评分均得到减轻。经过1周的治疗，TPRF组在自我评估的疼痛缓解（改善47.81％）和TENS组减少（改善19.1％）方面显示出明显更好的结局。因此，TPRF在短期减轻慢性肩痛方面似乎比TENS更有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号