• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>4th international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement 2010 >A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews in Software Engineering from the Perspective of the Research Questions Asked in the Reviews
【24h】

A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews in Software Engineering from the Perspective of the Research Questions Asked in the Reviews

机译：从评论中提出的研究问题出发对软件工程系统评论的批判性评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

After a seminal article introducing-evidence based software engineering in 2004, systematic reviews (SR) have been increasingly used as a method for conducting secondary studies in software engineering. Our goal is to critically appraise the use of SR in software engineering with respect to the research questions asked and the ways the questions were used in the reviews. We analyzed 53 literature reviews that had been collected in two published tertiary studies. We found that over 65% of the research questions asked in the reviews were exploratory and only 15% investigated causality questions. We concluded that there is a need for a consistent use of terminology to classify secondary studies and that reports of literature reviews should follow reporting guidelines to support assessment and comparison.
机译：在2004年开创性的文章介绍基于证据的软件工程之后，系统评价（SR）已越来越多地用作在软件工程中进行中学研究的方法。我们的目标是就所研究的问题和评论中问题的使用方式，严格评估SR在软件工程中的使用。我们分析了53篇文献评论，这些评论是在两次发表的第三次研究中收集的。我们发现，在评论中提出的研究问题中有超过65％是探索性的，只有15％的研究因果关系问题。我们得出的结论是，需要一致地使用术语对中学研究进行分类，并且文献综述的报告应遵循报告指南以支持评估和比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号