The Usability of Creativity - Experts v. Novices

机译：创意的可用性-专家诉新手

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In developing software for creative professionals, one goal is to enable new users to learn to use the product well. In this paper, we describe a study comparing how novices and experts use Adobe Photoshop. When asked to perform specific tasks in Photoshop, we found that, contrary to our expectations, the expert users often took longer at the tasks than the novices. While most usability practitioners assert that when users take a short time to perform a task, an application is more usable, when they take longer, it is less usable [4], based on our study's results, we posit that this is not always true. We posit that professional designers undertaking a creative task, are less aware or time, as in a flow state [1, 2, 3] and thus can take longer to perform tasks than novices. Furthermore, we found that rather than explore the interface for new features to complete a task, expert users frequently use slower, but more familiar, approaches.

机译：在为创意专业人士开发软件时，一个目标是使新用户能够很好地学习使用该产品。在本文中，我们描述了一项比较新手和专家如何使用Adobe Photoshop的研究。当被要求在Photoshop中执行特定任务时，我们发现，与我们的预期相反，专家用户执行这些任务的时间通常比新手更长。尽管大多数可用性从业者断言，当用户花很短的时间来执行任务时，应用程序更有用，而当用户花费更长的时间时，它的可用性就更差了[4]，根据我们的研究结果，我们认为并非总是如此。我们假设从事创造性工作的专业设计师没有意识或没有时间，例如处于流动状态[1、2、3]，因此与新手相比，执行任务所需的时间更长。此外，我们发现，专家用户经常使用较慢但更熟悉的方法，而不是探索用于完成任务的新功能的界面。

著录项

来源
《ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity and cognition 2009》|2009年|P.351-352|共2页
会议地点 Berkeley CA(US);Berkeley CA(US)
作者
Julie L. Baher; Bill Westerman;
展开▼
作者单位

Adobe Systems Inc. San Jose, CA 95110 USA;

rnCreate with Context Santa Clara, CA 95050;

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类创造发明、先进经验;
关键词
creativity; usability; software; Photoshop;

机译：创造力;可用性；软件;的Photoshop;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. An Improved Usability Measure Based on Novice and Expert Performance [J] . Karl F. MacDorman, Timothy J. Whalen, Chin-Chang Ho, International journal of human-computer interaction . 2011,第1a3期

机译：基于新手和专家绩效的改进的可用性度量
2. Joint action coordination in expert-novice pairs: Can experts predict novices' suboptimal timing? [J] . Wolf Thomas, Sebanz Natalie, Knoblich Gunther Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology . 2018,第期

机译：专家 - 新手对的联合行动协调：专家可以预测新手的次优吗？
3. Pair programming productivity: Novice-novice vs. expert-expert [J] . Lui KM, Chan KCC International journal of human-computer studies . 2006,第9期

机译：结对编程效率：新手与专家对决
4. Usability for novices and experts: A layered design in a case study in Malawi [C] . Kristoffer Tronerud, Martin Vasbotten, Jens Kaasb⊘ll, IST-Africa Week Conference . 2017

机译：新手和专家的可用性：马拉维案例研究中的分层设计
5. Use Of Experts' Gaze By Novice Usability Practitioners To Perform A Better Heuristic Evaluation. [D] . Bhandaram, Sree Anirudh J. 2015

机译：新手可用性从业人员使用专家的目光来执行更好的启发式评估。
6. Joint action coordination in expert-novice pairs: Can experts predict novices’ suboptimal timing? [O] . Thomas Wolf, Natalie Sebanz, Günther Knoblich -1

机译：新手对中的联合行动协调：专家可以预测新手的最佳时机吗？
7. We develop a model of scientific creativity and test it in the field of rare diseases. Our model is based on the results of an in-depth case study of the Rett syndrome. Archival analysis, bibliometric techniques and expert surveys are combined with network analysis to identify the most creative scientists. First, alternative measures of generative and combinatorial creativity are compared. Then, we generalize our results and present a stochastic model of socio-semantic network evolution. The model predictions are tested with multiple networks of rare disease specialties. We find that new scientific collaborations among experts in a field enhance combinatorial creativity. Instead, high entry rates of novices are negatively related to generative creativity. By extending the set of useful concepts, creative scientists gain in centrality. At the same time, by increasing their centrality in the scientific community, scientists can replicate and generalize their results, thus contributing to a scientific paradigm. [O] . Massimo Riccaboni, Maria Laura Frigotto 100

机译：我们开发了一种科学创造力模型，并在稀有疾病领域进行测试。我们的模型基于对Rett综合征的深入案例研究的结果。档案分析，文献计量技术和专家调查与网络分析相结合，以确定最具创造力的科学家。首先，比较生成和组合创造力的替代措施。然后，我们推广了我们的结果，并提出了社会语义网络演化的随机模型。模型预测用多个罕见疾病专业网络进行测试。我们发现，一个领域的专家之间的新的科学合作增强了组合创造力。相反，新手的高入门率与生成创造力负相关。通过扩展这组有用的概念，创造性的科学家获得了中心地位。同时，通过增加科学界的中心地位，科学家们可以复制和推广他们的结果，从而促进科学范式的发展。
8. Baseline Usability Evaluation of the American Community Survey Web Site with Novices and Expert Users. Study Series (Survey Methodology No. 2010-09) [R] . Chen, J., Holland, T., Olmsted-Hawala, E., 2010

机译：新手和专家用户对美国社区调查网站的基线可用性评估。研究系列（调查方法第2010-09号）

The Usability of Creativity - Experts v. Novices

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅