• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Amity International Conference on Artificial Intelligence >Analysis of the Publication Activity of University Researchers
【24h】

Analysis of the Publication Activity of University Researchers

机译：高校科研人员发表活动分析

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Today the competitiveness of the university is estimated by the results of what place it occupies in international rankings. The most famous ratings are “Times Higher Education World University Ranking” and “QS World University Ranking”. It is not so important in what rating your university participates; they all evaluate the publication activity of your researchers. This forces universities to evaluate the quality of publications of their scientists. It seems to be a simple task, but in fact, there are many risks of incorrect assessment. In order to avoid an incorrect assessment it is necessary to know these risks and to be able to avoid them. These risks can be classified as follows: errors that the scientometrical base allows (for example, Scopus); mistakes made by a university researcher (author of the publication); errors made by the analytical department. The errors of scientometrical databases include: lost citations of publications of university researchers; wrong identification of authors (incorrectly indicated affiliations or incorrectly indicated last names). The mistakes made by a university scientist include: the name of the university is incorrectly written in the publication; citation is incorrectly indicated in the publication; scientist each time differently writes his name. The errors made by the analytical department include: when analyzing publications, all the works of the author are taken into account (only those publications that are affiliated with the university should be taken into account); does not take into account the specific subject area of publications; year of publication is incorrectly taken into account; authors self-citations are not excluded.
机译：今天，该大学的竞争力是根据其在国际排名中所处位置的结果来估计的。最著名的评级是“泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名”和“ QS世界大学排名”。您的大学参加什么等级并不重要。他们都评估您研究人员的发表活动。这迫使大学评估其科学家出版物的质量。这似乎是一项简单的任务，但实际上，存在许多评估不正确的风险。为了避免错误的评估，有必要了解这些风险并能够避免它们。这些风险可分为以下几类：科学计量基础允许的误差（例如Scopus）；大学研究人员（出版物的作者）犯的错误；分析部门的错误。科学计量学数据库的错误包括：大学研究人员对出版物的引用丢失；错误的作者身份证明（不正确显示的从属关系或不正确显示的姓氏）。大学科学家犯的错误包括：大学名称在出版物中写错；出版物中错误地指出了引文；科学家每次都用不同的方式写下他的名字。分析部门所犯的错误包括：在分析出版物时，将作者的所有作品都考虑在内（仅考虑与大学有关联的那些出版物）；没有考虑出版物的特定主题领域；错误地考虑了出版年份；不排除作者的自我引文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号