• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Beijing International Tourism Symposium: Modern Leisure Practices amp; Tourism Development: Abstracts >Comparing and Research Chinese Recreation Mode with Japanese - Statistic and Analyze Based on Investigation about the Time Allocation of Beijing
【24h】

Comparing and Research Chinese Recreation Mode with Japanese - Statistic and Analyze Based on Investigation about the Time Allocation of Beijing

机译：中国休闲模式与日语的比较研究-基于北京时间分配的调查与分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although China and Japan both are belong to Asia, their recreational mode are different because their regime, economic seedtime and living mode has came into being for long time are different. The article analyzed and researched the data about time allocation investigated by Research Center of Recreation Economy, Renmin University of China in May 2006 and Stat. Bureau, General Affair Office of Japan in 2001. The names of the data from Beijing and Japan used by the article are same, but their classifying of statistic and investigation are different for thed-ifference in living manner between Beijing and Japan. For example, Japanese regard the examination as leisure, but Chinese regard physiological recovery as leisure. So, it' s hard to contrast and analyze them. Then, we did some essential adjustment in order to compare. The article mainly used Tokyo' s data, but it used Japan' s data instead of Tokyo' s that didn' t publish. It isn' t influencing to explain questions.
机译：尽管中国和日本都属于亚洲，但它们的娱乐方式却有所不同，因为它们的政权，经济播种时间和生活方式已长期形成。文章对中国人民大学娱乐经济研究中心2006年5月和国家统计局有关时间分配的数据进行了分析研究。日本事务总局，2001年。本文使用的来自北京和日本的数据名称相同，但出于生活方式上的差异，它们对统计和调查的分类有所不同。例如，日本人将考试视为休闲，而中国人则将生理恢复视为休闲。因此，很难对它们进行对比和分析。然后，我们进行了一些必要的调整以进行比较。本文主要使用东京的数据，但使用日本的数据而不是未发布的东京的数据。解释问题没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号