【24h】

Defending OSHA Facility Siting Citations

机译:捍卫OSHA设施选址引文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since the Process Safety Management Standard was promulgated, industry has struggled with how to effectively and feasibly comply with the facility siting provision of the Standard. This issue is very complex, and involves various industry guidance documents, good engineering practices, and the exercise of professional judgment. Many facets of the issue are evolving and subject to continuous debate within industry. For example, should qualitative or quantitative risk analysis be used? Should credible or worst case scenarios be used? Should occupancy criteria be 200 or 400 man hours per week? Should control rooms be moved or reinforced? Since the PSM Standard is a performance standard, industry and individual employers have a great deal of discretion in resolving these issues.
机译:自过程安全管理标准发布以来,行业一直在努力如何有效,切实地遵守该标准的设施选址规定。这个问题非常复杂,涉及各种行业指导文档,良好的工程实践和专业判断。这个问题的许多方面都在发展,并且在行业内不断辩论。例如,是否应使用定性或定量风险分析?应该使用可靠的还是最坏的情况?占用标准应该是每周200或400个工时吗?控制室应该移动还是加固?由于PSM标准是一项绩效标准,因此行业和个人雇主在解决这些问题方面拥有很大的酌处权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号