首页> 外文会议>Conference on Lasers in Dentistry Ⅷ, Jan 20-21, 2002, San Jose, USA >Comparison of coronal leakage after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser
【24h】

Comparison of coronal leakage after smear layer removal with EDTA or Er:YAG laser

机译:EDTA或Er:YAG激光去除涂片层后冠状漏血的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study determined, in vitro, the coronal leakage of root canals evaluating the effect of smear layer removal by either EDTA or laser. Two sealers were also compared. Sixty-four canines were instrumented with the step-back technique and irrigated with 10 ml of 1% sodium hypochlorite. In Group 1, 10 teeth were sealed with Sealer 26~(~R) and 10 teeth were sealed with Grossman cement with no attempt of smear layer removal. Group 2 received a final irrigation of 15 ml of 15% EDTA, and was sealed as in Group 1. Group 3 received Er:YAG laser application (2940 nm, 140 mJ, 15 Hz and 42 J, 300 pulses, 500milli-sec pulse duration), and sealed as in Group 1. Root canals sealed with Sealer 26 had significantly less coronal leakage than Grossman cement (p<0.05). Coronal leakage after smear layer removal with 15% EDTA or Er:YAG laser was not statistically different (p>0.01).
机译:这项研究在体外确定了根管的冠状漏出,评估了通过EDTA或激光清除涂片层的效果。还比较了两个封口机。用后退技术对64只犬进行检测,并用10 ml 1%的次氯酸钠进行灌溉。在第1组中,用Sealer 26〜(〜R)密封10颗牙齿,用Grossman水泥密封10颗牙齿,而未尝试去除涂抹层。第2组接受15 ml 15%EDTA的最终冲洗,并按第1组的要求密封。第3组接受Er:YAG激光照射(2940 nm,140 mJ,15 Hz和42 J,300脉冲,500毫秒脉冲)持续时间),并按第1组进行密封。用Sealer 26密封的根管冠状漏血明显少于Grossman水泥(p <0.05)。用15%EDTA或Er:YAG激光去除涂片层后的冠状漏出率无统计学差异(p> 0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号