【24h】

Analysis of Set-cover traitor tracing scheme

机译:集套叛逆者追踪方案分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we report our work to analyze the false positive of the Set-cover probabilistic traitor tracing scheme. The Set-cover scheme was proposed to trace a coalition of traitors simultaneously. Comparing with most tracing schemes, the Set-cover scheme identifies more traitors per tracing. The authors of Set-cover scheme claimed their scheme greatly reduced the false positive and increased the tracing efficiency. They also claimed the Set-cover scheme is a good candidate to replace the tracing scheme used in the standard AACS (Advanced Access Content System). However, we present an Enclosure attack to challenge the Set-cover scheme. With the attack we can frame multi innocent users at one time with unnegligible probability no matter how many movies are detected, namely, the false positive of Set-cover scheme is much higher than the authors claimed. Both of our theoretical results and experimental results show that 39 arbitrary users can successfully frame 7 users with a probability bigger than 80%, which means the false positive is bigger than 80%. Obviously, such a false positive is too high to be applied in practice.
机译:在本文中,我们报告了我们的工作,以分析Set-cover概率叛徒追踪方案的误报。提出了集盖方案,以同时追踪叛徒联盟。与大多数跟踪方案相比,“集盖”方案每次跟踪可识别更多叛徒。 Set-cover方案的作者声称他们的方案大大减少了误报并提高了跟踪效率。他们还声称,Set-cover方案是替代标准AACS(高级访问内​​容系统)中使用的跟踪方案的不错选择。但是,我们提出了一种机箱攻击来挑战机顶盒方案。通过这种攻击,无论检测到多少部电影,我们都可以一次将多个无辜用户陷害,也就是说,“机密封面”方案的误报率要比作者声称的高得多。我们的理论结果和实验结果均表明,39个任意用户可以成功构图7个用户,概率大于80%,这意味着假阳性大于80%。显然,这种误报率太高而无法在实践中应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号