• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Digital fabrication 2010 : Technical programs and proceedings >Usability Evaluation of Paper/PC/e-Paper Proceeding Books
【24h】

Usability Evaluation of Paper/PC/e-Paper Proceeding Books

机译：纸/ PC /电子纸诉讼书的可用性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We have compared usability of paper/PC/e-Paper (electrophoretic display) proceeding books assuming they were used by audiences during a conference.rnSubjects were requested to point out the difference between the figures in slides and proceeding when they were assumed to be audiences for a short presentation of 5 minutes. Correct answer rates were evaluated when they were using the three different medium respectively. The e-Paper proceeding showed better preference, in subjective evaluation, than PC proceeding. Full page showing by e-Paper may be preferred than partial page showing by PC. The e-Paper proceeding has shown, however, lower answer rate than the other two mediums. The longest time, on e-Paper, required for paging was assumed as the cause of the lowest correct answer rate shown for the e-Paper proceeding book.
机译：我们比较了假设纸/ PC /电子纸（电泳显示器）程序书籍在会议期间被观众使用的可用性.rn要求受试者指出幻灯片中的数字与假定为观众的程序之间的差异。 5分钟的简短演示。正确答案率分别在使用三种不同的媒体时进行了评估。在主观评价中，电子纸程序比PC程序显示出更好的偏好。通过电子纸显示的完整页面可能比通过PC显示的部分页面更可取。但是，电子纸论文集显示出比其他两种媒体更低的回答率。在电子纸上，分页所需的最长时间被认为是导致电子纸处理手册显示正确率最低的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号