【24h】

TRADING-OFF CONSUMPTION OF ROUTING AND PRECISION OF MEMBERSHIP IN AD HOC NETWORKS

机译:AD HOC网络中路由选择的权衡消耗和成员的精度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The development of distributed applications and components for ad hoc networks rises specific questions. The need for energy-efficient protocols is always one major concern in the design. Nevertheless, when several services are to be simultaneously provided, the choice of the most energy saving option for an individual component may be against the quality of other services. In this paper we focus on providing routing together with a global membership estimation. The former is a fundamental service in ad hoc networks. The latter will be required by any distributed application using consensus. Some proactive routing protocols, as OLSR, already maintain at each node information on the global composition of the system. With reactive routing algorithms, as DSR, a specific service must be used to monitor the global system composition. We perform a study of the joint performance of routing and failure discovery services in the case of OLSR, which provides both at once, and in the case of DSR routing complemented with gossip-style failure detection. We compare the energy consumption of both approaches and show that the advantage of one routing service over the other may be compensated or inverted when bounds are imposed on the liveness of membership monitoring information.
机译:自组织网络的分布式应用程序和组件的开发引起了一些具体问题。对节能协议的需求始终是设计中的主要关注点。然而,当要同时提供几种服务时,为单个组件选择最节能的选择可能会与其他服务的质量背道而驰。在本文中,我们专注于提供路由以及全局成员估计。前者是ad hoc网络中的一项基本服务。使用共识的任何分布式应用程序都将需要后者。一些主动路由协议(例如OLSR)已经在每个节点上维护了有关系统全局组成的信息。使用反应式路由算法(如DSR),必须使用特定服务来监视全局系统组成。我们对OLSR情况下路由和故障发现服务的联合性能进行了研究,而OLSR同时提供了这种服务,而DSR路由则结合了八卦式故障检测。我们比较了两种方法的能耗,并表明,当对成员资格监视信息的活动性施加限制时,一种路由服务相对于另一种路由服务的优势可能会得到补偿或倒置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号