• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Ideas to impact: how building economic standards keep you on track >Classification of Construction Costs-An International Overview from a UK Perspective
【24h】

Classification of Construction Costs-An International Overview from a UK Perspective

机译：建筑成本分类-英国视角的国际概览

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The development of elemental cost planning in the UK gave rise to a generally adopted Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) standard for classifying costs for buildings. The existence of data in this format has underpinned the development of cost control and, recently, the UK government's cost reduction strategy, which is based on the existence of reliable benchmark data. Similar concepts and classifications have also been developed around the world. Attempts to exchange data with other European countries in the Conseil European des Economistes de la Construction (CEEC) identified some significant differences in national usages for similar concepts (i.e., that in our "common" exchange language of cost per unit area for a building type, neither the costs nor the area were measuring the same thing). This resulted in the CEEC Code of Measurement for Cost Planning, which proposes a common grouping for the building elements and identifies the different area definitions. UNIFORMATII will be mapped to the Code. RICS has undertaken surveys to identify element classifications in other countries and produced Principles of Element Classification for Buildings (International) to promote the concept and use of elements. Until recently, there has been no widespread adoption of these methodologies in civil engineering, despite the Building Cost Information Service (BCIS) having produced a Standard Form of Civil Engineering Cost Analysis for use by the UK Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO). The government's desire for benchmarks has led to a wider interest in consistent cost breakdown structures for civil engineering and the development of Building Information Modelling (BIM) is premised on the integration of classification systems used by all parties to the development of a project. The revisions to ISO 12006-2 Building Construction-Organisation of Information About Construction Works-Framework for Classification need to be reviewed in this context.
机译：英国基本成本计划的发展引起了英国皇家特许测量师学会（RICS）普遍采用的建筑物成本分类标准。这种格式的数据的存在为成本控制的发展提供了支撑，最近，英国政府基于可靠基准数据的存在而降低了成本的战略也得到了支持。在世界范围内也已开发出类似的概念和分类。尝试在欧洲建筑经济委员会（CEEC）中与其他欧洲国家交换数据，发现类似概念在各国用法上存在一些重大差异（即，在我们“常见”的建筑类型单位面积成本交换语言中，成本和面积都无法衡量同一事物）。这产生了《 CEEC成本计划计量准则》，该准则提出了建筑要素的通用分组，并标识了不同的区域定义。 UNIFORMATII将映射到该守则。 RICS进行了调查以识别其他国家的元素分类，并制定了《建筑物元素分类原则（国际）》以促进元素的概念和使用。直到最近，尽管建筑成本信息服务（BCIS）编制了一份标准格式的土木工程成本分析供英国国防基础设施组织（DIO）使用，但土木工程尚未广泛采用这些方法。政府对基准的渴望已导致人们对用于土木工程的一致的成本明细结构产生了更大的兴趣，并且建筑信息模型（BIM）的开发建立在集成项目开发各方使用的分类系统的前提下。在这种情况下，需要对ISO 12006-2建筑施工组织-有关建筑工程信息的组织-分类框架进行修订。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号