• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Workshops on Internet Science >Privacy and Social Movements
【24h】

Privacy and Social Movements

机译：隐私与社会运动

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Privacy is an often controversial, misunderstood, and underestimated concept, including on purpose by actors like governments or the Silicon Valley giants of Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon (GAFA). Unfortunately, due to today's technologies, the potential for intrusions into personal privacy have increased exponentially. Even though there are different laws that protect privacy (i.e. GDPR) what is considered to be private by individuals and what is legally protected as private can differ. Different apps have different privacy policies, which leads to the protection of usually limited types of information, but not others. This situation is dangerous for social movements. Hackers and academics have been developing tools like Tor and Signal to encrypt our messages, and protect the right to privacy and anonymity. However, so much more needs to be done, both from a technical perspective, and through advocacy. Individuals, NGOs, activists: Everyone is a potential target of surveillance. In this paper we discuss the impact of privacy violations on social movements and the tools for encrypted messaging currently used by social movements. We show that the misunderstandings around privacy by users and the causes that prevent the developing of better tools for social movements.
机译：隐私是一个经常引起争议，被误解和低估的概念，其中包括政府或谷歌，苹果，Facebook和亚马逊（GAFA）的硅谷巨人的故意行为。不幸的是，由于当今的技术，侵入个人隐私的潜力呈指数增长。即使有不同的法律保护隐私（例如GDPR），个人认为什么是私人的，以及法律认为是私人的东西也可能有所不同。不同的应用程序具有不同的隐私权政策，从而可以保护通常有限类型的信息，而不能保护其他类型的信息。这种情况对于社会运动是危险的。黑客和学者一直在开发Tor和Signal之类的工具来加密我们的消息，并保护隐私权和匿名权。但是，无论是从技术角度还是通过宣传，都需要做更多的工作。个人，非政府组织，活动家：每个人都是监视的潜在目标。在本文中，我们讨论了侵犯隐私权对社交活动的影响以及社交活动当前使用的加密消息传递工具。我们表明，用户对隐私的误解以及导致无法开发更好的社交活动工具的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号