首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Computers in Railways; 2004; Dresden; DE >Validation of a train simulation model with train detection data
【24h】

Validation of a train simulation model with train detection data

机译:利用列车检测数据验证列车仿真模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Rail traffic simulation tools are used for timetable design and for the analysis of existing timetables. For these models, correct data for infrastructure and rolling stock are needed. Parameters are often estimated, but this can lead to differences with real train operation, especially when these models are used for timetable designs of lines or networks with larger distances. Important in this respect is the validation of the running times, speed profiles and track occupation times. In this paper, the validation of a simulation model is described. The running times in this model are based on the calculation of traction force and resistance of Dutch trains. Acceleration and braking rates are determined from measured data. Validation takes place on the basis of train detection data of an Intercity and an Interregional train on the line from Rotterdam to The Hague HS (The Netherlands). In the case of the Intercity, standard trains are operated. The result is a running time, calculated by the simulation model RailSys, which is 5.7 % larger than the minimum running time measured by train detection data. This small difference is rather acceptable. The validation of the Interregional train shows a large difference between the model calculation and the train detection data: 11.9%. There were serious problems with the disposition of trains. Due to lack of data of actual train disposition, it was impossible to either select the appropriate trains or to calculate the appropriate running times.
机译:铁路交通仿真工具用于时间表设计和现有时间表的分析。对于这些模型,需要正确的基础结构和机车车辆数据。通常会估计参数,但这可能会导致实际列车运行产生差异,尤其是当这些模型用于具有较大距离的线路或网络的时间表设计时。在这方面重要的是确认运行时间,速度曲线和轨道占用时间。在本文中,描述了仿真模型的验证。该模型的运行时间基于荷兰火车的牵引力和阻力的计算。根据测量数据确定加速度和制动率。验证是基于从鹿特丹到海牙HS(荷兰)的城际和区域间列车的列车检测数据进行的。在城际列车的情况下,将运行标准列车。结果是运行时间,由仿真模型RailSys计算得出,比火车检测数据测得的最小运行时间大了5.7%。这种小的差异是可以接受的。区域间列车的验证显示,模型计算与列车检测数据之间存在较大差异:11.9%。火车的布置存在严重问题。由于缺乏实际列车配置的数据,因此无法选择合适的列车或计算合适的运行时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号