• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Conceptual Modeling; 20061106-09; Tucson,AZ(US) >In Defense Of a Trope-Based Ontology for Conceptual Modeling: An Example with the Foundations of Attributes, Weak Entities and Datatypes
【24h】

In Defense Of a Trope-Based Ontology for Conceptual Modeling: An Example with the Foundations of Attributes, Weak Entities and Datatypes

机译：为基于Trope的概念建模本体辩护：以属性，弱实体和数据类型为基础的示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in approaches that employ foundational ontologies as theoretical tools for analyzing and improving conceptual modeling languages. However, some of these approaches do not always make explicit their ontological commitments. This leads to situations where criticisms resulting from the specific ontological choices made by a particular approach are generalized to the enterprise of ontology as a whole. In this paper we discuss an example of such a case involving the BWW approach. First, we make explicit the ontological commitments underlying that approach by relating it to other possible philosophical alternatives. Second, we construct an ontological theory which commits to a different philosophical position. Third, we show how the ontology proposed here can be used to provide real-world semantics and sound modeling guidelines for the modeling constructs of Attributes, Weak Entities and Datatypes. Finally, we compare the ontology proposed here with BWW, thus demonstrating its benefits.
机译：近年来，人们越来越关注采用基础本体作为分析和改进概念建模语言的理论工具的方法。但是，其中一些方法并不总是明确地表明其本体论承诺。这导致了这样一种情况，即由特定方法做出的特定本体选择所引起的批评被普遍推广到整个本体企业。在本文中，我们讨论了涉及BWW方法的这种情况的示例。首先，通过将其与其他可能的哲学选择联系起来，我们明确表明了该方法所基于的本体论承诺。其次，我们构建了一个本体论理论，它致力于不同的哲学立场。第三，我们展示了这里提出的本体如何用于为属性，弱实体和数据类型的建模构造提供真实世界的语义和声音建模指南。最后，我们将此处提出的本体与BWW进行了比较，从而证明了其优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号