• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Enhanced Building Operations; 20061106-08; Shenzhen(CN) >Methodologies for Determining Persistence of Commissioning Benefits
【24h】

Methodologies for Determining Persistence of Commissioning Benefits

机译：确定调试利益持久性的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Studies on the persistence of commissioning benefits to date have used a variety of methods to evaluate this persistence. This paper proposes a consistent framework for describing and evaluating the persistence of commissioning benefits. It begins by splitting commissioning benefits into two broad categories: 1) benefits that inherently persist; and 2) benefits that may not persist. The study of persistence then considers only the benefits that may not persist. These benefits are critical, since the top five reasons cited for performing commissioning in both new buildings and existing buildings are benefits that may not persist. These benefits are then further divided into benefits that may be quantified and benefits that are generally difficult to quantify. This paper proposes that benefits that may be quantified should generally be evaluated for persistence using approaches that are already widely accepted and used for other purposes, with adaptations where needed.Specifically, it proposes that energy and water savings be evaluated using methods consistent with the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (adapted with additional weather normalization), that comfort and indoor air quality improvements be evaluated using relevant standards, specifically ASHRAE Standard 55 and ASHRAE Standard 62, but goes further and proposes a methodology for economic quantification of these benefits as well. Finally, it is proposed that the persistence of measures whose benefit is difficult to quantify be evaluated simply by determining whether the measure is still in place or performing.
机译：迄今为止，关于调试收益的持久性的研究已使用多种方法来评估这种持久性。本文提出了一个一致的框架来描述和评估委托收益的持久性。首先将调试利益分成两大类：1）固有地存在的利益； 2）可能无法持久的收益。然后，对持久性的研究只考虑了可能不会持久的利益。这些好处至关重要，因为在新建筑物和现有建筑物中进行调试的前五个原因是可能不会持久的好处。然后，将这些收益进一步分为可以量化的收益和通常难以量化的收益。本文建议通常应使用已经被广泛接受并用于其他目的的方法对可量化的收益进行持久性评估，并根据需要进行调整。特别是，建议使用与国际标准相一致的方法评估节能和节水性能测量和验证协议（适用于附加的天气正常化），使用相关标准（尤其是ASHRAE标准55和ASHRAE标准62）评估舒适度和室内空气质量的改善，但它还进一步提出了经济上量化这些收益的方法。最后，建议仅通过确定该措施是否仍在执行或执行，来评估其收益难以量化的措施的持久性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号