Academia and industry collaboration from a construction engineering perspective

机译：从建筑工程的角度看学术界和产业界的合作

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This paper discusses the what, why, who and how regarding the collaboration between academia and construction industry. New materials, processes & equipment and intellectual property issues, together with educational examples of academia-industry collaboration are presented. The preparation of global construction/structural engineers who can make a smooth transition from their academic training into the work force almost anywhere in the world with confidence and maximum productivity in areas of education, research, and business can be achieved through well defined, carefully designed, and appropriately implemented academia-industry collaboration. The 21 st Century shall witness even more innovative applications within the construction industry that require the introduction of new building materials, equipment, and methods, as well as qualified and adequately trained personnel. The technological progress in the construction industry depends on two elements, namely: innovation and resources. Resources are introduced as MPLEM - an acronym that stands for Money, People, Land, Equipment, and Materials. When discussing intellectual property issues, important details need to be visited such as who pays for the research work, the degree of secrecy in research, who owns the outcome, who files for a patent, who gets rights to the outcome, and what are the conditions to get those rights.

机译：本文讨论了学术界和建筑业之间的合作的内容，原因，对象和方式。介绍了新材料，新工艺和新设备以及知识产权问题，以及产学合作的教育实例。通过精心设计，精心设计，可以使全球的建筑/结构工程师在教育，研究和业务领域充满信心并实现最高生产率，从而为他们从学术培训平稳过渡到全球几乎任何地方的工作人员做好准备，并适当实施产学合作。 21世纪将见证建筑业中更多创新的应用，这些新应用需要引入新的建筑材料，设备和方法，以及合格且受过良好培训的人员。建筑业的技术进步取决于两个要素，即创新和资源。资源以MPLEM的形式引入-MPLEM代表金钱，人员，土地，设备和材料。在讨论知识产权问题时，需要访问重要的细节，例如谁为研究工作付费，研究的保密程度，谁拥有结果，谁申请专利，谁获得结果的权利以及什么是专利权。获得这些权利的条件。

著录项

来源
《International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference(ISEC-03); 20050920-23; Shunan(JP)》|2005年|P.667-670|共4页
会议地点 Shunan(JP)
作者
W.S. Wahby;
展开▼
作者单位

Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, USA;

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类混凝土结构、钢筋混凝土结构;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Identifying the Perception Differences of Emerging Construction-Related Technologies between Industry and Academia to Enable High Levels of Collaboration [J] . Jang Youjin, Kim Kinam, Leite Fernanda, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management . 2021,第10期

机译：确定行业与学术界新兴建筑有关技术的感知差异，以实现高水平的协作
2. Developing Construction Information Systems Courses Based on Collaboration between Industry and Academia [J] . Ralph Tayeh, Raja R. A. Issa Journal of Architectural Engineering . 2021,第3期

机译：基于行业与学术界的合作开发建筑信息系统课程
3. Establishing the Critical Barriers to Academia-Industry Collaboration in Building Construction Research in Ghana [J] . Dok Yen D. M., Adinyira E., Dauda A. M. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management . 2018,第5期

机译：在加纳建筑施工研究中建立产学合作的关键障碍
4. Industry and ET Education Collaborations From A Construction Engineering Perspective [C] . Wafeek Samuel Wahby ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition . 2004

机译：建筑工程视角下的行业和教育合作
5. Hospitality Industry's Perceptions of Industry-Academia Collaboration in Curriculum Development [D] . Griffin, Walter Clarke. 2019

机译：酒店业的看法在课程开发中的工业学术界合作
6. Academia–Pharma Intersect: Providing a Broader Perspective on Drug Development Synergies between Academia and Industry [O] . Bruce A. Chabner 2010

机译：学术界与制药界的交叉：为学术界与工业界之间的药物开发协同增效提供更广阔的视野
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Academia and industry collaboration from a construction engineering perspective

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅