• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>World congress and exhibition on intelligent transport systems and services;ITS world congress >PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR ROAD USER CHARGING PRIVACY VS CONFIDENTIALITY
【24h】

PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR ROAD USER CHARGING PRIVACY VS CONFIDENTIALITY

机译：道路使用者收费隐私与机密性的隐私影响评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As the need to finance and sustain our valuable infrastructure grows and matures, more and more countries are turning to tolling and road user charging paradigms in their transport policy. The age-old “user-pays” approach provides an equitable and fair means to charge for the actual use of our infrastructure and provide a funding mechanism that endures. When toll roads multiply into network tolling and access is charged for our urban centers, the collection of charging data also implies the collection of personal data and the safeguarding of that information. This paper will begin by touching briefly on the meaning of privacy since this term is at times used interchangeably with confidentiality and security. But let me assure you that these are not one and the same. While privacy may subsume what is implied by confidentiality, it is a much broader concept involving the right to be free from intrusions, to remain autonomous, and to control the circulation of information about oneself.
机译：随着融资和维持我们宝贵的基础设施的需求日益增长和成熟，越来越多的国家在其运输政策中转向收费和道路使用者收费范例。古老的“用户付费”方法提供了公平，公正的手段来对我们的基础架构的实际使用进行收费，并提供了持久的资金机制。当收费公路成倍增加网络收费并向我们的城市中心收取通行费时，收费数据的收集还意味着收集个人数据并保护该信息。本文将首先简要介绍隐私的含义，因为该术语有时与机密性和安全性可互换使用。但是，请允许我向您保证，这些不是一回事。尽管隐私可以包含保密性所隐含的含义，但它是一个范围更广的概念，涉及不受侵扰，保持自治和控制有关自己的信息流通的权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号