首页> 外文会议>Legal Practice and International Laws >Observations regarding the decision no.53 of the 25th of January 2011 of the Constitutional Court respective to the Senate's decision to validate magistrates elected as members of the Superior Council of Magistrates

【24h】

Observations regarding the decision no.53 of the 25th of January 2011 of the Constitutional Court respective to the Senate's decision to validate magistrates elected as members of the Superior Council of Magistrates

机译：关于宪法法院2011年1月25日第53号决定的意见，分别涉及参议院关于确认当选为地方高级法官委员会成员的地方法官的决定

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In this paper we present the decision no.53/25th of January 2011 of the Constitutional Court of Romania decision regarding the Senate decision no.43 of the 22nd of December 2010 to validate magistrates elected as members of the Superior Council of Magistrates.The analysis is centered both on the majority's opinion and the separate opinion formulated in the case. Both opinions have views we believe to be pertinent and compatible to legal doctrine and precedents of the constitutional court. The absolute originality and freshness resides in the analysis of the recent modification of the organisation law of the court, with no concrete points of view so far to argument exhaustively on the matter of interpreting and solving this type of complaint to the Constitutional Court.

机译：在本文中，我们提出了罗马尼亚宪法法院2011年1月第53/25号决定，该决定涉及参议院2010年12月22日第43号决定，以确认当选为地方治安高级理事会成员的治安法官。既以多数人的意见为中心，也以案件中提出的单独意见为中心。我们认为这两种观点都与宪法学说的法律学说和判例有关，并与之兼容。绝对的新颖性和新颖性在于对法院组织法最近修改的分析，到目前为止，还没有具体的观点就解释和解决向宪法法院提出的这类申诉进行详尽的论证。

著录项

来源
《Legal Practice and International Laws》|2011年|p.187-192|共6页
会议地点 Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO);Brasov(RO)
作者
OANA SARAMET; SILVIU-GABRIEL BARBU;
展开▼
作者单位

Faculty of Law University of Transilvania Brasov Eroilor Blvd.no.25 ROMANIA;

Faculty of Law University of Transilvania Brasov Eroilor Blvd.no.25 ROMANIA;

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类法律;
关键词
control; majority; separate; complaint; magistrates; validation; provision; constitutionality; senate; court;

机译：控制;多数;分离;投诉裁判官验证；规定;合宪;参议院;法庭;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. A qualitative exploration of the views and experiences of family court magistrates making decisions in care proceedings involving parents with learning disabilities [J] . KollinskyL., SimondsL.M., NixonJ. British journal of learning disabilities . 2013,第2期

机译：对家庭法院法官在涉及学习障碍父母的护理程序中做出决定的观点和经验的定性探索
2. Part-time work and Social Security: a step backwards in the process of equalization of labor conditions. Commentary on the decision of the Spanish Constitutional Court 156/2014, September 25th [J] . Carolina Gala Durán IusLabor . 2014,第3期

机译：兼职工作和社会保障：在劳动条件均等化过程中倒退了一步。 9月25日，西班牙宪法法院156/2014号决定的评注
3. 'Graywater' Decision of the Supreme Court 25 January 2018 - Case No. 1/2011 [J] . IIC:International review of intellectual property and competition law . 2020,第1期

机译：最高法院的'Graywater'裁决2018年1月25日-第1/2011号案件
4. Observations regarding the decision no.53 of the 25th of January 2011 of the Constitutional Court respective to the Senate's decision to validate magistrates elected as members of the Superior Council of Magistrates [C] . OANA SARAMET, SILVIU-GABRIEL BARBU International Conference on Tradition and Innovation in the Academic Law System . 2011

机译：Observations regarding the decision no.53 of the 25th of January 2011 of the Constitutional Court respective to the Senate's decision to validate magistrates elected as members of the Superior Council of Magistrates
5. A qualitative exploration of the views and experiences of family court magistrates making decisions in care proceedings involving parents with learning disabilities [O] . Kollinsky, L, Simonds, LM, Nixon, J 2013

机译：对家庭法院法官在涉及学习障碍父母的护理程序中做出决定的观点和经验的定性探索

Observations regarding the decision no.53 of the 25th of January 2011 of the Constitutional Court respective to the Senate's decision to validate magistrates elected as members of the Superior Council of Magistrates

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅