首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics >Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning
【24h】

Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning

机译:组成问题不需要多跳推理

获取原文

摘要

Multi-hop reading comprehension (RC) questions are challenging because they require reading and reasoning over multiple paragraphs. We argue that it can be difficult to construct large multi-hop RC datasets. For example, even highly compositional questions can be answered with a single hop if they target specific entity types, or the facts needed to answer them are redundant. Our analysis is centered on HOTPOTQA, where we show that single-hop reasoning can solve much more of the dataset than previously thought. We introduce a single-hop BERT-based RC model that achieves 67 F1—comparable to state-of-the-art multi-hop models. We also design an evaluation setting where humans are not shown all of the necessary paragraphs for the intended multi-hop reasoning but can still answer over 80% of questions. Together with detailed error analysis, these results suggest there should be an increasing focus on the role of evidence in multi-hop reasoning and possibly even a shift towards information retrieval style evaluations with large and diverse evidence collections.
机译:多跳阅读理解(RC)问题是具有挑战性的,因为它们需要阅读和推理多个段落。我们争辩说,构建大型多跳RC数据集可能很困难。例如,如果它们靶向特定的实体类型,或者回答它们所需的事实是冗余的,可以通过单跳回答甚至高度合成问题。我们的分析是以热渍的方式为中心的,在那里我们表明单跳推理可以解决比以前想象的更多数据集。我们介绍了一种基于单跳的BERT基RC模型,实现了与最先进的多跳模型相当的67 F1。我们还设计了一个评估设置,其中人类未显示所有必要的段落,以实现预期的多跳推理,但仍然可以回答超过80%的问题。这些结果表明,这些结果表明,应该越来越侧重于多跳推理中的证据的作用,并且可能甚至可以转向具有大型和多样化的证据汇集的信息检索风格评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号