• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >Conceptual versus Procedural Feedback in the Training of a Home Medical Device
【24h】

Conceptual versus Procedural Feedback in the Training of a Home Medical Device

机译：家用医疗器械培训中的概念反馈与过程反馈

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

With the aid of new technology, the use of home medical devices is becoming more prevalent among older adults. These devices are often not designed with consideration for the cognitive differences that come with aging, and older adults often require training to use the devices. This study considered a blood glucose monitor, and attempted to discern what type of feedback yielded better performance from older adults: conceptual or procedural feedback-training. Participants calibrated the monitor and were given feedback when they made mistakes. The prediction was that the procedurally trained group would require fewer trials to attain criterion (a trial without error), but that the conceptually trained group would have better performance after a retention interval, showing a greater understanding of the system. Results indicated that there was no significant difference in performance between experimental conditions, but that feedback itself had a positive effect on performance.
机译：借助新技术，家庭医疗设备的使用在老年人中变得越来越普遍。这些设备通常在设计时并未考虑到衰老带来的认知差异，并且老年人通常需要接受培训才能使用这些设备。这项研究考虑了血糖监测仪，并试图辨别哪种类型的反馈能使老年人获得更好的表现：概念或程序反馈培训。参与者对监视器进行了校准，并在犯错时得到反馈。预测是，经过程序训练的组将需要更少的试验来达到标准（无错误的试验），但是经过概念训练的组在保留间隔后将具有更好的性能，从而显示出对该系统的更多理解。结果表明，实验条件之间的性能没有显着差异，但是反馈本身对性能有积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号