首页> 外文会议>Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA), 2008 >Cost overruns in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects: Which explanations can be given?
【24h】

Cost overruns in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects: Which explanations can be given?

机译:大型运输基础设施项目中的成本超支:可以给出哪些解释?

获取原文

摘要

Managing large-scale transportation infrastructure projects is difficult due to frequent misinformation about the costs and benefits, which results in large cost overruns and benefit shortfalls that often threaten the project viability. This paper explores the explanations for cost overruns that have been presented in previous studies, and whether these explanations are theoretically embedded. Two categories of explanations for cost overruns are distinguished: political explanations and non-political explanations. This paper also investigates whether there are theories that have not yet been included in the literature on cost overruns that can contribute to the understanding of cost overruns. For political explanations agency theory is considered the most interesting and an eclectic theory is considered possible as well. Non-political explanations are diverse in character, therefore a range of different theories (including rational choice theory and prospect theory), dependent on the kind of explanation is considered more appropriate than one all-embracing theory.
机译:由于经常会误解有关成本和收益的信息,因此难以管理大型运输基础设施项目,这会导致大量的成本超支和收益不足,从而经常威胁到项目的可行性。本文探讨了先前研究中提出的成本超支的解释,以及这些解释是否在理论上是嵌入的。成本超支的解释分为两类:政治解释和非政治解释。本文还研究了关于成本超支的文献中是否还没有包含一些有助于理解成本超支的理论。对于政治解释而言,代理理论被认为是最有趣的,折衷理论也被认为是可能的。非政治解释的特征是多种多样的,因此,取决于一种解释类型的各种理论(包括理性选择理论和前景理论)被认为比一种包容各方的理论更为合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号