首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo >A SYSTEMATIC COMPARISON AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION OF HUMID POWER CYCLES: PART 2 - ECONOMICS

【24h】

A SYSTEMATIC COMPARISON AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION OF HUMID POWER CYCLES: PART 2 - ECONOMICS

机译：潮湿动力循环的系统比较和多目标优化：第2部分 - 经济学

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The STIG, HAT and TOPHAT cycles lie at the centre of the debate on which humid power cycle will deliver optimal performance when applied to an aero-derivative gas turbine and, indeed, when such cycles will be implemented. Of these humid cycles, it has been claimed that the TOPHAT cycle has the highest efficiency and specific work, followed closely by the HAT (Humid Air Turbine) and then the STIG (STeam Injected Gas turbine) cycle. In this study, the systems have been simulated using consistent therrnodynamic and economic models for the components and working fluid properties, allowing a consistent and non-biased appraisal of these systems. Part 1 of these two papers focussed on the thermodynamic performance and the impact of the system parameters on the performance, part 2 studies the economic performance of these cycles. The three humid power systems and up to ten system parameters are optimised using a multi-objective Tabu Search algorithm, developed in the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre.

机译：当应用于这种循环时，剧本，帽子和Tophat循环位于潮流动力循环在适用于航空衍生的燃气轮机时，潮湿动力循环的中心位于潮流性能。在这些潮湿的循环中，据称，顶部循环具有最高的效率和特定工作，紧随其后的帽子（潮湿的风力涡轮机），然后是塞子（蒸汽注入的燃气轮机）循环。在该研究中，已经使用一致的Therrnody动力学和经济模型来模拟系统，用于组件和工作流体性能，允许对这些系统的一致和非偏见的评估进行致意。这两篇论文中的第1部分侧重于热力学性能和系统参数对性能的影响，第2部分研究了这些循环的经济性能。使用多目标禁忌搜索算法优化了三种潮湿的电力系统和最多十种系统参数，在剑桥工程设计中心开发。

著录项

来源
《ASME turbo expo》|2008年||共12页
会议地点
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
会议组织
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类气体透平（涡轮机）;
关键词
C: cost-rate (S/s); C_j: cash-flow in year j (S); c: unit Cost (S/kg); i: discount rate (); m: mass flow-rate (kg/s); et al;

机译：C：成本率（S / S）;C_J：j（s）的现金流;C：单位成本（S / kg）;我：折扣率（％）;M：质量流量（kg / s）;等;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A Systematic Comparison and Multi-Objective Optimization of Humid Power Cycles-Part II: Economics [J] . R. M. Kavanagh, G. T. Parks Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power . 2009,第4期

机译：湿式功率循环的系统比较和多目标优化-第二部分：经济学
2. A Systematic Comparison and Multi-Objective Optimization of Humid Power Cycles-Part I: Thermodynamics [J] . R. M. Kavanagh, G. T. Parks Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power . 2009,第4期

机译：湿式功率循环的系统比较和多目标优化-第一部分：热力学
3. Multi-objective thermoeconomic optimisation for combined-cycle power plant using particle swarm optimisation and compared with two approaches: an application [J] . Abdalisousan Ashkan, Fani Maryam, Farhanieh Bijan, International Journal of Exergy . 2015,第4期

机译：基于粒子群算法的联合循环电厂多目标热经济优化方法与两种方法的比较：
4. A SYSTEMATIC COMPARISON AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION OF HUMID POWER CYCLES: PART 2 - ECONOMICS [C] . Ronan M. Kavanagh, Geoffrey T. Parks ASME turbo expo . 2008

机译：混合动力循环的系统比较和多目标优化：第2部分-经济学
5. Investigation of Geothermal Heat Extraction Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (sCO2) and Its Utilization in sCO2-based Power Cycles and Organic Rankine Cycles - A Thermodynamic & Economic Perspective [D] . Wang, Xingchao. 2018

机译：超临界二氧化碳（SCO2）对地热散热的研究及其在基于SCO2的功率循环和有机朗肯循环中的利用 - 一种热力学与经济视角
6. Adaptive grid based multi-objective Cauchy differential evolution for stochastic dynamic economic emission dispatch with wind power uncertainty [O] . Huifeng Zhang, Xiaohui Lei, Chao Wang, 2011

机译：基于自适应网格的多目标柯西微分演化用于风能不确定的随机动态经济排放调度
7. A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design [O] . García Kerdan, I, Raslan, R, Ruyssevelt, P, 2017

机译：基于能源/经济的基础与基于经济经济的低碳建筑能源设计多目标优化的比较
8. Economic Evaluation of GCC Power Plants Based on the STEAG Combined-Cycle Design and Comparison with a US Combined-Cycle-Based System. Final Report [R] . Coleman, B. S., Crawford, C. D., Joiner, J. R. 1979

机译：基于sTEaG联合循环设计与美国联合循环系统比较的海湾合作委员会电厂经济评价。总结报告

A SYSTEMATIC COMPARISON AND MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMISATION OF HUMID POWER CYCLES: PART 2 - ECONOMICS

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅