【24h】

A Statistical Analysis of Strategy Choices in WTO Dispute Settlement 1995-2007

机译:1995-2007年WTO争端解决中战略选择的统计分析。

获取原文

摘要

Based on the WTO dispute settlement procedure, analyses statistically the strategy choices of dispute settlement in every stage since WTO establishment and the strategy choices from United States of America, European Union, Canada and India. Its results indicates complainant would be more and more choose the strategy of requesting to establish a Panel in consultation stage, complainant would prefer to choose the strategy of Panel report in Panel stage, high probability of respondent and low probability of complainant to continue appeal in Appeal Body stage, respondents choose strategy of implementation WTO judgment in most cases at the Implementation stage, all complainants choose the retaliation strategy in response to the non-implementation of WTO judgment by respondents at the request retaliation stage, all complainants choose to implement retaliation at the retaliation implementation stage, and the strategies choose is difference in USA,EU, Canada and India.
机译:根据WTO争端解决程序,对WTO成立以来各个阶段的争端解决战略选择以及来自美国,欧盟,加拿大和印度的战略选择进行统计分析。结果表明,申诉人将越来越多地选择在咨询阶段请求建立专家组的策略,申诉人倾向于在专家组阶段选择专家组报告的策略,被诉人的可能性较高,而申诉人在上诉中继续上诉的可能性较低。正文阶段,在大多数情况下,受访者在实施阶段选择实施WTO判决的策略,所有投诉者都在请求报复阶段针对被访者未执行WTO判决的行为选择报复策略,所有投诉者都选择在实施报复阶段实施报复。报复实施阶段,而策略选择是在美国,欧盟,加拿大和印度有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号