• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>INMM annual meeting >A Paper Submitted for the Summer 2009 Edition of the JNMM for presentationat the INMM Annual Meeting, Tucson, Arizona, July, 2009
【24h】

A Paper Submitted for the Summer 2009 Edition of the JNMM for presentationat the INMM Annual Meeting, Tucson, Arizona, July, 2009

机译：2009年夏季版JNMM提交并提交的论文在2009年7月于亚利桑那州图森举行的INMM年会上

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The State-level approach provides a new foundation for safeguards implementation andevaluation. This represents a fundamentally new direction for the IAEA safeguardssystem – one that provides for enhanced effectiveness (in terms of better focusingsafeguards effort) and efficiency (in terms of better utilisation of IAEA verificationresources). While the State-level approach is being applied to all States with safeguardsagreements, the optimisation of the approach can only be achieved for a State with both aComprehensive Safeguards Agreement and an Additional Protocol in force and for whomthe Agency concludes that the declared nuclear material in the State has not been divertedand provides credible assurance of the absence of undeclared nuclear material andactivities in the State as a whole. On this basis, the Agency can move to a State-levelintegrated safeguards approach. Canada achieved this broad conclusion for the first timein September, 2005 and it has been maintained annually since that time. Accordingly, theIAEA and the Canadian S.S.A.C. have been pursuing the implementation of a State-levelintegrated safeguards approach for Canada. The initiative is well-advanced and the targetfor completion remains mid-2009. This paper will discuss the State-level approach in thecontext of the next steps in international safeguards. In doing so, it will briefly outline theprimary elements of the concept and identify some considerations relevant to thecontinued evolution of the approach. Finally, the paper will review, in general terms, theapplication of the approach to Canada thereby providing a country-specific context to theevolving conceptual framework.
机译：国家一级的方法为保障措施的实施和实施提供了新的基础。 评估。这是原子能机构保障监督工作的根本新方向 系统–提供增强的有效性（就更好地集中精力而言） 保障努力）和效率（就更好地利用原子能机构核查而言） 资源）。虽然将国家一级的方法适用于所有有保障的国家 协议，这种方法的优化只能在一个既有两个国家又有一个国家的国家中实现。 《全面保障协定》和《附加议定书》对谁有效 原子能机构的结论是，该国已申报的核材料尚未被转用 并提供可靠的保证，确保不存在未申报的核材料和 整个国家的活动。在此基础上，原子能机构可以移至国家一级 综合保障措施。加拿大首次取得这一广泛结论 自2005年9月起，每年进行一次维护。因此， 原子能机构和加拿大S.S.A.C.一直在追求国家一级的实施 加拿大的综合保障措施。该倡议是先进的，目标是 待完成日期仍为2009年中。本文将讨论国家层面的方法。 国际保障措施下一步行动的背景。在此过程中，它将简要概述 概念的主要元素，并确定与 该方法的不断发展。最后，本文将概括地回顾一下 该方法在加拿大的应用，从而为 不断发展的概念框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号