• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences >Have IS Researchers Lost Bandura's Self-Efficacy Concept? A Discussion of the Definition and Measurement of Computer Self-Efficacy
【24h】

Have IS Researchers Lost Bandura's Self-Efficacy Concept? A Discussion of the Definition and Measurement of Computer Self-Efficacy

机译：IS研究人员是否失去了Bandura的自我效能观念？关于计算机自我效能的定义和度量的讨论

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There has been something of an academic debate between proponents of two different kinds of computer self-efficacy: general computer self-efficacy ala Compeau and Higgins on the one hand, and specific computer self-efficacy ala Marakas et al. on the other. It has been argued that specific self-efficacy more clearly shows the impact of treatments and more clearly shows the impact on performance. Here we argue that these two constructs (as measured) are two very different constructs, one deriving from Bandura's definition and conceptualization of self-efficacy, and the other deriving from Gist and co-authors' definition and conceptualization of self-efficacy. We argue that though the IS research field seems to be moving in the direction of specific computer self-efficacy, general computer self-efficacy is quite different and quite important. Further, we argue that using the same label for these two different constructs invites misunderstanding and even misdirection.
机译：在两种不同类型的计算机自我效能的支持者之间展开了一场学术辩论：一方面是通用计算机自我效能ala Compeau和Higgins，另一方面是特定计算机自我效能ala Marakas等。在另一。有人认为，特定的自我效能能更清楚地显示出治疗的效果，并且更清楚地表明对性能的影响。在这里，我们认为这两个构架（如实测）是两个截然不同的构架，一个构架来自于班杜拉的自我效能感的定义和概念化，另一个来自于Gist和合著者的自我效能感的定义和概念化。我们认为，尽管IS研究领域似乎正在朝着特定计算机自我效能的方向发展，但一般的计算机自我效能却截然不同并且非常重要。此外，我们认为对这两个不同的构造使用相同的标签会引起误解甚至误导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号