• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International conference on urban regeneration and sustainability >CONSIDERING NEW URBANISM, NEW RURALISM AND GREEN URBANISM IN RESPONSE TO MULTIFUNCTIONALITY: THE CASE OF VERKYKERSKOP, SOUTH AFRICA
【24h】

CONSIDERING NEW URBANISM, NEW RURALISM AND GREEN URBANISM IN RESPONSE TO MULTIFUNCTIONALITY: THE CASE OF VERKYKERSKOP, SOUTH AFRICA

机译：考虑到新的城市主义，新的农村和绿色城市主义，以回应多功能性：南非维尔西克斯科普的案例

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Paul Davidoff charged planners in 1965, as a profession making urban life more beautiful, exciting, creative and more just, as having little to say. The task thereupon was to train a generation of planners to go well beyond the designers of the sixties in their ability to prescribe future urban life. Nijkamp, in 1980, affirms the Utopians' claim that the future is open and flexible, and that every development in the community, could imply a surprising step towards something better. A half century since Davidoff s indications, planners encounter ever expanding planning approaches, "towards something better", ranging from compact cities, transit oriented developments, new urbanism, new ruralism, shared cities, to smart growth and, of late, green urbanism and eco-cities; all in response to multifunctionality. Although the concept of multifunctionality has gained increasing attention the last decade, there is much frustration amongst planners regarding a proper set of broadly based definitions and clear statements concerning its scientific points of departure. This research argues that a combination of planning approaches are a more suitable response in attaining multifunctional land use; especially as megatrends underscore the need for moving away from seeking a predictable single future or outcome. The uniqueness of the Southern African landscape, inherently being rural, necessitated a rural accentuation on multifunctionality. Applying theory-based sampling as part of qualitative inquiry into the recently planned rural village of Verkykerskop, acclaimed by the Charter for New Urbanism in 2012, it is questioned whether the reciprocal employment of planning approaches induced multifunctional rural land use. Offering a design philosophy, whereby "farming, playing and living" is attained through the combined appliance of new urbanism, rural urbanism and green urbanism in planning the rural village, conclusions are drawn relating to the conduciveness of these approaches in achieving multifunctional rural land use.
机译：保罗大迪夫为1965年收取规划师，作为一个职业，使城市生活更加美丽，令人兴奋，创造性，更恰好，只要说话。其中的任务是培养一代人的规划人员，超越六十年代的设计师，以投行未来城市生活的能力。 Nijkamp于1980年肯定了乌托邦人的声明，未来是开放和灵活性的，而且社区的每一个发展都可能意味着更好的令人惊讶的一步。半个世纪以来，达维夫的迹象，规划者遇到了扩展的规划方法，“走向更好”，从紧凑的城市，过境的发展，新的城市主义，新的农村，共用城市，聪明的增长，深刻，绿色城市主义和生态城市;所有响应多功能性。虽然多功能性的概念在过去十年中升高了越来越长，但策划者之间有很多挫败感，关于一个适当基础的定义和关于其科学出发点的清晰陈述。本研究认为，规划方法的组合是在获得多功能土地使用方面更合适的反应;特别是随着Megatends强调，需要远离寻求可预测的单一未来或结果的需求。南部非洲景观的独特性，本质上是农村的，需要对多功能性的农村突出。将基于理论的抽样应用于最近计划的Verkykerskop村庄的定性查询的一部分，由2012年新城市主义的宪章赞誉，它质疑规划方法是否促成多功能农村土地利用的互惠就业。提供一个设计理念，其中“农，玩生活”是通过新都市，农村城市化和规划乡村绿色城市的综合家电达到，得出以下结论有关的这些的conduciveness实现多功能农村土地的使用方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号