首页> 外文会议>International technical meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation >Improving ambiguity validation and integrity monitoring of Precise Point Positioning (PPP)
【24h】

Improving ambiguity validation and integrity monitoring of Precise Point Positioning (PPP)

机译:改进精确点定位(PPP)的歧义验证和完整性监控

获取原文

摘要

Reliable resolution and validation of carrier-phaseambiguities is a major challenge when employing fixedambiguity Precise Point Positioning (PPP). The currentPPP ambiguity validation and resolution methods areanalyzed and tested in this paper for the case of usingGPS L1 and L2 signals without external ionosphericcorrections. Based on the Integer Least-Squares usingDoubly Non-Central F-distribution based ratio testthreshold (ILSDNCF) with a 1200 s carrier-phase locktime requirement is chosen as the most reliable. It yields arate of incorrect ambiguity resolution of 12.7%. It isdefined that ambiguity resolution is incorrect, if themagnitude of the 3D position error is larger than 10.7 cm,which is the wavelength of the narrow-lane signalcombination, at the initial ambiguity resolution epoch.Ambiguity resolution is defined as correct, if the 3Dposition error is smaller or equal than 10.7 cm at the initial ambiguity resolution epoch, and undecided, ifambiguity resolution cannot be done at all.However, the rate of incorrect ambiguity resolutionachieved with this method is too high for many real-lifeapplications. This paper, therefore, develops,enhancements to improve PPP performance. Theenhanced PPP method uses a time window basedambiguity validation and both GPS and GLONASS toimprove GPS ambiguity resolution. The achieved rate ofincorrect ambiguity resolution is 6.0% when using GPSalone and 5.3% when using both GPS and GLONASS.The rate correct ambiguity resolution is 80.8% whenusing GPS alone and 82.2% when using both GPS andGLONASS. Compared to the most reliable existingmethod, the correct ambiguity resolution rate is increasedby 8.9% when using GPS alone and 10.8% when usingboth GPS and GLONASS.In terms of the horizontal, vertical and 3D position errorsat the initial ambiguity resolution epoch, employing theenhanced PPP method using GPS and GLONASSmeasurements reduced the errors by 40.0%, 23.8% and31.7%, respectively, compared to the most reliableexisting PPP method. In terms of the solutionconvergence time, there is no significant differencebetween the enhanced PPP method and existing methods.On integrity monitoring, improvements are developed toenable a more realistic computation of protection levels.
机译:可靠地解析和验证载波相位 采用固定方式时,歧义性是一项重大挑战 歧义精确点定位(PPP)。目前 PPP模糊性验证和解决方法是 本文针对使用情况进行了分析和测试 没有外部电离层的GPS L1和L2信号 更正。基于整数最小二乘使用 基于双非中心F分布的比率检验 门限(ILSDNCF),载波相位锁定为1200 s 时间要求被选为最可靠的。它产生一个 错误歧义解决率达12.7%。它是 定义歧义解析是不正确的,如果 3D位置误差的幅度大于10.7厘米, 这是窄道信号的波长 组合,在最初的歧义解决时期。 如果3D模式,歧义度分辨率定义为正确 在初始歧义度分辨率时代,位置误差小于或等于10.7厘米,并且,如果 根本无法解决歧义。 但是,歧义解析的错误率 对于许多现实生活来说,用这种方法实现的效果都太高了 应用程序。因此,本文发展起来, 增强功能以​​提高PPP性能。这 增强的PPP方法使用基于时间窗口 模糊度验证以及GPS和GLONASS都可以 提高GPS模糊度分辨率。达到率 使用GPS时,不正确的歧义分辨率为6.0% 单独使用,当同时使用GPS和GLONASS时为5.3%。 正确率的歧义分辨率为80.8%时 单独使用GPS以及同时使用GPS和GPS时占82.2% GLONASS。与最可靠的现有产品相比 方法,增加了正确的歧义分辨率 单独使用GPS时降低8.9%,而单独使用GPS时降低10.8% GPS和GLONASS。 在水平,垂直和3D位置误差方面 在最初的歧义解决时代,采用 GPS和GLONASS的增强PPP方法 测量将误差减少了40.0%,23.8%和 与最可靠的相比分别为31.7% 现有的PPP方法。在解决方案方面 收敛时间,无明显差异 在增强的PPP方法和现有方法之间。 在完整性监控方面,已开发出改进措施,以 可以更实际地计算保护级别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号