首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >Does Formal Authority Still Matter in the Age of Wisdom of Crowds?: Perceived Credibility, Peer and Professor Endorsement in Relation to College Students’ Wikipedia Use for Academic Purposes
【24h】

Does Formal Authority Still Matter in the Age of Wisdom of Crowds?: Perceived Credibility, Peer and Professor Endorsement in Relation to College Students’ Wikipedia Use for Academic Purposes

机译:在人群的智慧时代,形式权威是否仍然重要?:与大学生使用维基百科用于学术目的相关的可信度,同行和教授的认可

获取原文

摘要

This study explores whether or not formal authority stillmatters for college students using Wikipedia by examiningthe variables of individual perceived credibility, peerendorsement and professor endorsement in relation tostudents’ academic use of Wikipedia. A web survey wasused to collected data in fall 2011. A total of 142 studentsparticipated in the study, of which a total of 123 surveyswere useable for this study. The findings show that themore professors approved of Wikipedia, the more studentsused it for academic purposes. In addition, the morestudents perceived Wikipedia as credible, the more theyused it for academic purposes. The results indicate thatformal authority still influences students’ use of usergeneratedcontent (UGC) in their formal domain, academicwork. The results can be applicable to other UGC, whichcalls attention to educators’ active intervention toappropriate academic use of UGC. Professors’ guidelinesfor UGC would benefit students.
机译:这项研究探讨了是否仍然有正式的权威 对大学生使用Wikipedia进行审查很重要 个人感知信誉的变量,同伴 背书和教授背书 学生对维基百科的学术使用。一项网络调查是 过去在2011年秋季收集数据。共有142名学生 参加了这项研究,其中共有123项调查 可用于这项研究。调查结果表明 维基百科的教授越多,学生越多 用于学术目的。另外,更多 学生认为维基百科是可信的,他们越 用于学术目的。结果表明 正式授权仍然会影响学生对用户生成的使用 正式领域中的内容(UGC),学术 工作。结果可以适用于其他教资会, 提请注意教育工作者的积极干预 教资会的适当学术用途。教授指南 因为教资会会令学生受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号