首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >SPACE DEBRIS REMEDIATION- COMMON BUT DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITY *
【24h】

SPACE DEBRIS REMEDIATION- COMMON BUT DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITY *

机译:空间碎片修复-共同但有区别的责任*

获取原文

摘要

The topic of Space Debris in the context of long term sustainability of outer space activities for peaceful purpose, is gaining momentum and raising concerns, due to ever growing human made debris population in outer space. With the increase in the scope of outer space activities driven by vast application areas vis-a-vis increase in number of space-faring nations and related players, the situation warrants certain remediation measures beyond mitigation measures. Cleaning-up of the debris dumped all these years of space activities, is quite imperative. While the concept of Active Debris Removal (ADR), poses many technical challenges in terms of development, demonstration and implementation, it poses certain non-technical challenges to international space community relating to policy aspects, international consensus & collaboration, investment & economic viability and legal issues. Legal challenges include a host of issues such as definitional issues on space debris vis-a-vis space objects, affiliation of ownership and responsibility of space objects/ debris originating from 'launching state', 'state-of-registry', abandonment of space objects & debris, liability issues in the course of disposal activities, enforcement of technology controls & safeguards, intellectual property protection, and on so on. The provisions under UN Treaties on outer space activities such as Space Object, Launching State, State responsibility, Liability, Jurisdiction & Control, due regards and avoidance of harmful interference to others space activities, which indirectly address the problems of space debris could be taken support to address the legal issues associated with topic of ADR. Prevailing UN Guidelines on space debris mitigation are to be implemented by states through national policies and regulations on voluntary basis and hence they are non-binding soft law instruments. Nevertheless, some analogy could be drawn from the Law of Sea (Article 60 and Article 80 of UN Convention on the Law of Sea, 1982), and Nairobi International Convention on the removal of wrecks, 2007, which are very much comparable to the responsibility of a launching state or state of registry in respect of their inactive space objects like defunct spacecraft and rocket bodies and components thereof. The economic dimension of the concept and operation of ADR and associated operational liability issues could be addressed through sharing of burden in an equitable manner. The principle of 'polluters pays' could be applied on the basis of Common but Differentiated Responsibility principle, amongst the space faring nations. ADR activities could be facilitated, monitored and governed by an international body under UN arrangement.
机译:由于外层空间中人为制造的碎片数量不断增加,在外层空间活动为和平目的的长期可持续性的背景下,空间碎片的主题正在获得发展势头并引起人们的关注。随着航天应用国家和相关参与者数量的增加,由广阔的应用领域推动的外层空间活动范围的扩大,这种情况需要采取缓解措施以外的某些补救措施。这些年来清理空间活动中遗留下来的碎片是非常必要的。主动清除碎片(ADR)的概念在开发,示范和实施方面提出了许多技术挑战,但在政策方面,国际共识与合作,投资和经济生存能力以及法律问题。法律挑战包括许多问题,例如关于空间碎片相对于空间物体的定义性问题,源于“发射状态”,“注册状态”,放弃空间的空间物体/碎片的所有权和责任归属物品和碎片,处置活动中的责任问题,技术控制和保障措施的执行,知识产权保护等。可以支持《联合国条约》中有关外层空间活动的规定,例如空间物体,发射国,国家责任,责任,管辖权和控制,应适当考虑和避免对其他空间活动的有害干扰,这些规定间接解决了空间碎片问题。解决与ADR主题相关的法律问题。现行的《联合国关于减轻空间碎片的准则》将由各国在自愿基础上通过国家政策和法规实施,因此,它们是不具有约束力的软法律文书。但是,可以从海洋法(1982年《联合国海洋法公约》第60条和第80条)和2007年《关于清除沉船的内罗毕国际公约》中得出一些类比,这在责任上可比关于它们的非活动空间物体(如已灭绝的航天器,火箭体及其部件)的发射状态或登记状态的信息。 ADR的概念和运作以及相关的经营责任问题的经济方面可以通过公平分担负担来解决。在航天大国中,“污染者付费”的原则可以在共同但有区别的责任原则的基础上适用。在联合国的安排下,国际机构可以促进,监督和管理ADR活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号