• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Annual meeting of the transportation research board;Transportation Research Board >Drivers, Pedestrians, and Cyclists in California Want Complete Streets A Comparison of Results from Roadway Design Surveys of Pedestrians, Drivers, Bicyclists, and Transit Users in Northern and Southern California
【24h】

Drivers, Pedestrians, and Cyclists in California Want Complete Streets A Comparison of Results from Roadway Design Surveys of Pedestrians, Drivers, Bicyclists, and Transit Users in Northern and Southern California

机译：加利福尼亚州的驾驶员，行人和骑自行车者想要完整的街道-加利福尼亚州北部和南部的行人，驾驶员，骑自行车者和公交用户的道路设计调查结果的比较

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper compares findings from two recent surveys on roadway design preferences amongpedestrians, drivers, bicyclists, and public transit users along major urban corridors in the metroareas of San Francisco and Los Angeles. Sponsored by the California DOT, the researchexplored design preferences that could increase perceived traffic safety, walkability, bikability,and economic vitality along urban arterials.Results from intercept surveys showed that roadway users desire similar design featuresalong the test corridors, which carry 25,000-40,000 motorists bi-directionally and havecomprehensive sidewalk coverage, but little to no on-street bicycle facilities. In response to anopen-ended question about street improvements to enhance perceived traffic safety, Bay Arearespondents ranked bicycle lanes and improved pedestrian crossings first and second overall,while respondents in the LA area ranked them in reverse order. Decreased speed was rankedthird in the Bay Area, and 5th in the LA area. Other top suggestions included increasing streetlighting, traffic signals, and stop signs in the Bay Area, and better maintained roads andincreased travel space in the LA area.These findings add to the growing body of evidence that design features generallydeemed beneficial to one user group, such as pedestrian crossings for pedestrians, may alsobenefit other users. Moreover, these results suggest that roadway planning can implement a fewkey design interventions to enhance the travel experience of multiple user groups. Overall, thefindings support the continued implementation of complete streets principles and policies.
机译：本文比较了最近两项关于道路设计偏好的调查结果 地铁主要城市走廊上的行人，驾驶员，自行车骑士和公共交通用户 旧金山和洛杉矶地区。由加州交通部赞助的这项研究 探索了可以提高感知的交通安全性，步行性，可骑行性的设计偏好， 和城市动脉沿线的经济活力。 拦截调查的结果表明，巷道用户希望获得类似的设计功能 沿着测试走廊，双向载有25,000-40,000名驾车者，并且 人行道全面覆盖，但路边自行车设施很少甚至没有。回应 关于改善街道以提高感知交通安全性的开放式问题，海湾地区 受访者将自行车道和改善的人行横道排名第一和第二， 而洛杉矶地区的受访者则以相反的顺序对其进行排名。速度下降排名 在湾区排名第三，在洛杉矶区排名第五。其他主要建议包括增加街道 湾区的照明，交通信号灯和停车标志，以及维护良好的道路和 增加了洛杉矶地区的旅行空间。 这些发现增加了越来越多的证据表明设计通常具有特征 被认为对一个用户组有利的行人，例如行人的人行横道 使其他用户受益。此外，这些结果表明，道路规划可以实施一些 关键设计干预措施，以增强多个用户群体的旅行体验。总体而言， 调查结果支持继续执行完整的街道原则和政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号