首页> 外文会议>COTA international conference of transportation professionals >The Comparison between Visual Distraction and Cognitive Distraction
【24h】

The Comparison between Visual Distraction and Cognitive Distraction

机译:视觉干扰与认知干扰的比较

获取原文

摘要

Many incidents and crashes can be attributed to driver distraction, due to increasing use of in-vehicle information systems (IVISs). Although visual and cognitive distraction has been studied extensively, relatively little research has compared the differences of effects between them on driving performance in the field. To fill this gap, twelve participants drove on roads under three distraction conditions: without distraction, with visual distraction, with cognitive distraction. Results revealed that visual distraction leads to higher speed variance and resulted in higher workload. Cognitive distraction made steering less smooth, but improved lane maintenance. Visual distraction was associated with more off-road glances, while increased blink frequency was observed during cognitive distraction. Both distractions caused gaze concentration and slow saccades when drivers looked at the roadway. Overall, visual distraction interferes with driving performance more than cognitive distraction, but they influence vehicle control and gaze behavior in different ways. These results suggest that minimizing visual demand is particularly important in the design of in-vehicle systems and also will be beneficial for the development of distraction countermeasures.
机译:由于越来越多地使用车载信息系统(IVIS),许多事故和撞车事故都可归因于驾驶员的分心。尽管对视觉和认知分散注意力已进行了广泛研究,但相对较少的研究比较了它们之间对现场驾驶性能的影响之间的差异。为了填补这一空白,十二名参与者在三种分散注意力的情况下在道路上行驶:无分散注意力,视力分散,认知分散。结果表明,视力分散会导致更高的速度差异并导致更高的工作量。认知分散注意力使转向不那么顺畅,但改善了车道维护。视力分散与更多的越野目光相关,而认知分散期间观察到眨眼频率增加。当驾驶员看着车道时,这两种干扰都会引起凝视和缓慢扫视。总体而言,视觉干扰对驾驶性能的影响要大于认知干扰,但它们以不同的方式影响车辆的控制和注视行为。这些结果表明,最小化视觉需求在车载系统的设计中尤为重要,并且也将有助于分心对策的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号