• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International astronautical congress >THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL SPACE LEGISLATION AND SUBSEQUENT STATE PRACTICE ON THE INTERPRETATION OF INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF SPACEFARING
【24h】

THE IMPACT OF NATIONAL SPACE LEGISLATION AND SUBSEQUENT STATE PRACTICE ON THE INTERPRETATION OF INTERNATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF SPACEFARING

机译：国家空间立法和随后的国家惯例对解释国际空间原则的影响

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Though international space law is frequently characterised as lacunal, the general nature of the provisions of the existing UN space treaties is such as to cover all activities by public and private entities that can be characterised as exploration or use. The lack of detailed rules regulating every conceivable activity in space should thus not be taken as an indication that there are forms of exploration or use of outer space that escape the application of the fundamental principles of international space law. This realisation is fundamental in trying to understand the current deadlock in international space lawmaking. The UN space law regime is characterised by principles of global cooperation and inclusion that nonetheless only grant enforceable rights of protected use to individual States that arc factually capable of implementing the legally equal freedom of all States to engage in spaccfaring activities (Arts. I, II and IX OST). In this context, it is understandable that technologically advanced States are turning their space law-making efforts to a national interpretation of the existing principles that furthers their own intercstcs instead of engaging in protracted multilateral negotiation processes that risk upsetting the basic balance of the existing space law regime that favours them in the first place. We arc hence witnessing a clear regulatory shift in space law-making, from the international level to the national level. This shift is characterised by an increasing body of practice of a limited number of States in the application of space law principles that were adopted specifically with the intention of guaranteeing access to an inclusive environment for equal use and exploration by all States. The paper assesses the extent to which the interpretation of these universal principles may be affected by a selective application by a small number of States.
机译：尽管国际空间法经常被描述为空洞的，但现有的联合国空间条约的规定的一般性质是涵盖公共和私人实体的所有活动，这些活动可以被定义为探索或使用。因此，不应将缺乏规范每种可能发生的空间活动的详细规则作为指示，表明存在某种形式的探索或利用外层空间而无法适用国际空间法基本原则的情况。这种认识对于试图了解当前国际空间立法的僵局至关重要。联合国空间法制度的特点是全球合作和包容性原则，尽管如此，联合国空间法仅授予那些实际上有能力实施所有国家法律上平等的从事划伤活动的自由的国家的强制使用保护权（第一，第二条）。和IX OST）。在这种情况下，可以理解的是，技术先进的国家正在将其空间立法的努力转向对现有原则的国家解释，以促进本国之间的相互了解，而不是进行可能危及现有空间基本平衡的旷日持久的多边谈判进程。首先是对他们有利的法律​​制度。因此，我们目睹了太空立法从国际到国家的明显监管转变。这种转变的特点是，在适用空间法原则时，数量有限的国家越来越多地采用这种做法，这些原则是专门为保障所有国家平等使用和探索而创造的包容性环境。本文评估了少数国家选择性应用这些普遍原则的解释可能受到的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号