首页> 外文会议>Geotechnical frontiers >Comparison of Two Laboratory Methods for Measuring the Critical Temperature of Sandy Soils
【24h】

Comparison of Two Laboratory Methods for Measuring the Critical Temperature of Sandy Soils

机译:两种测量沙土临界温度的实验室方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

In this study, soil critical temperature was measured using two distinct approaches: (1) a temperature profile established from a heating element located at the top of a vertical column and (2) temperature and moisture profiles induced from a centrally placed heating source in a 'horizontal' apparatus. Steady-state thermal and moisture equilibrium took longer to establish in the horizontal apparatus (on average, nine hours longer); however, the resulting temperature and moisture profiles were more consistent in the horizontal apparatus and with easily discerned slope discontinuities between the dry and moist zones. More ambiguous temperature profiles were observed in the vertical apparatus, even with insulation and heat tape applied to minimize horizontal boundary losses. This is indicative of the difficulty in maintaining one-dimensional heat flow in a vertical column. As soil critical temperature is an important parameter used in designing underground infrastructure impacted by significant heat transfer, such as buried power cables, refinement and standardization of equipment and protocol for determining this parameter in a precise and mechanistically sound manner is of prime concern.
机译:在这项研究中,使用两种不同的方法测量了土壤临界温度:(1)由位于垂直柱顶部的加热元件建立的温度曲线,以及(2)由位于中央的加热源集中产生的温度和湿度曲线“水平”仪器。在卧式设备中建立稳态的热和水分平衡需要更长的时间(平均要长9个小时)。然而,在水平仪中得到的温度和湿度分布更加一致,并且在干燥和潮湿区域之间具有易于辨别的坡度不连续性。在垂直设备中观察到更模糊的温度曲线,即使使用绝缘材料和加热胶带也可以使水平边界损耗最小。这表明难以在垂直列中维持一维热流。由于土壤临界温度是用于设计受大量传热影响的地下基础设施(例如地下电缆)的重要参数,因此设备的优化和标准化以及以精确且机械合理的方式确定该参数的协议非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号