首页> 外文会议>Geotechnical frontiers >Challenges in Assessing the Shear Strength of Offshore Sediments Using Simple Shear Tests
【24h】

Challenges in Assessing the Shear Strength of Offshore Sediments Using Simple Shear Tests

机译:使用简单的剪切试验评估海上沉积物的剪切强度的挑战

获取原文

摘要

This paper investigates the monotonic and cyclic response of offshore carbonate sediment and silica sand using two different types of simple shear apparatus (referred to as 'rigid' boundary and 'flexible' boundary simple shear apparatus in this paper). In the 'rigid' boundary apparatus a series of concentric rings were used around the specimen to transfer the shear strain from the bottom to the top of the specimen, whilst in the 'flexible' boundary apparatus an unreinforced membrane was used to confine the specimen. All the tests were carried out on reconstituted specimens with similar initial conditions. The effects of these different boundary conditions on the monotonic and cyclic shearing response are presented in this paper. Comparisons between inferred and directly measured pore-water pressures and shear strain responses are also presented in this paper. This paper demonstrates that there are significant differences in the results obtained using the two types of simple shear apparatus. The difference is more pronounced for silica sand compared to the fine grained carbonate sediment used in this study.
机译:本文使用两种不同类型的简单剪切装置(本文称为“刚性”边界和“柔性”边界简单剪切装置)研究了海上碳酸盐沉积物和硅砂的单调和循环响应。在“刚性”边界设备中,在样品周围使用了一系列同心环,以将剪切应变从样品的底部传递到顶部,而在“柔性”边界设备中,未增强的膜用于限制样品。所有测试均在初始条件相似的再生标本上进行。本文介绍了这些不同的边界条件对单调和循环剪切响应的影响。本文还提供了推断和直接测量的孔隙水压力与剪切应变响应之间的比较。本文证明了使用两种类型的简单剪切仪获得的结果存在显着差异。与本研究中使用的细粒碳酸盐沉积物相比,硅砂的差异更为明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号