• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management >Internet service providers liability for third party content: Freedom to operate?
【24h】

Internet service providers liability for third party content: Freedom to operate?

机译：互联网服务提供商对第三方内容的责任：自由经营？

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are instrumental in the smooth running of Internet service and they should enjoy some freedom to operate without unnecessary fear of being sued for the illegality of the content that flows through their network. Without such immunity, no ISPs would be willing to invest money in acquiring latest technology and protocols in the provision of their services. Generally, ISPs possess no editorial control over the online materials that passes through their services. It is therefore justified that they should neither be imposed with the legal burden to police content nor be held liable for any infringing or harmful materials posted online. In early United States (U.S.) jurisprudence, the courts have found ISPs to be liable for third party contents if they moderated or exercised some forms of editorial control over them. The U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) has managed to change the legal landscape by creating a mandatory obligation on ISPs to take down those infringing materials once the copyright holders give a notice of takedown request. In exchange, a `safe harbour' privilege is assured to the ISPs so that they are exempted from liabilities that might arise from their action in complying with the takedown request. The system which was introduced and is currently in practice in the U.S. seems to garner a wide acceptance gradually and has been adopted in some other countries. In support of this contention, efforts to transpose the similar procedure transpired via negotiations and multi-lateral agreements involving a number of countries.
机译：Internet服务提供商（ISP）在Internet服务的平稳运行中起着重要作用，它们应该享有一定的操作自由，而不必担心因流经其网络的内容的非法而被起诉。没有这种免疫力，任何ISP都不会愿意花钱购买提供服务的最新技术和协议。通常，ISP对通过其服务传递的在线资料没有任何编辑控制权。因此，有理由认为，不应对警察的内容施加法律负担，也不应对在线发布的任何侵权或有害材料负责。在美国（美国）早期的判例中，法院发现，如果ISP主持或对它们进行某种形式的编辑控制，则它们应对第三方内容负责。美国数字千年版权法案（DMCA）设法通过在版权持有人发出删除请求通知后强制互联网服务提供商（ISP）删除这些侵权材料的强制性义务，从而改变了法律格局。作为交换，将向ISP确保“安全港”特权，从而使他们免于因其为遵守移除要求而采取的行动可能产生的责任。引入并目前在美国实践的该系统似乎逐渐获得了广泛的接受，并已在其他一些国家采用。为了支持这一论点，通过涉及多个国家的谈判和多边协议，努力移交类似程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号