首页> 外文会议>COTA international conference of transportation professionals >Pricing Policy between Container Terminals with Different Capital Natures
【24h】

Pricing Policy between Container Terminals with Different Capital Natures

机译:不同资本性质的集装箱码头之间的定价政策

获取原文

摘要

Since the late 1980s and early 1990s, many countries gradually started the reforms of port policy. Comparing with other countries which are on the same boat, the regulatory reforms of the Chinese port system was on the process of deregulation of foreign investment which means that there were more sectors allowed to be invested, like port sector, Sino-foreign joint venture, even wholly foreign-owned terminal. Nowadays, China has formed different capital natures of container terminals, such as the state investment, foreign investment, bank loans, self-raised funds, and IPO. This study presents an analysis of the pricing policy between two container terminals using a game theoretical model of two-stage non-cooperative. Our main finding is that the pricing policy adopted by the container terminal depending on its capital nature, and the Nash equilibrium is for both container terminals to adopt the not price-matching policy or foreign investment terminal; to adopt the price-matching policy while state investment terminal; to adopt the not price-matching policy.
机译:自1980年代末和1990年代初以来,许多国家逐渐开始了港口政策的改革。与其他国家相比,中国港口系统的监管改革是在放松对外国投资的管制过程中,这意味着允许更多的投资领域,如港口领域,中外合资企业,甚至是外资码头。如今,中国已经形成了集装箱码头的不同资本性质,例如国家投资,外国投资,银行贷款,自筹资金和首次公开募股。本研究使用两阶段非合作博弈模型对两个集装箱码头之间的定价策略进行了分析。我们的主要发现是,集装箱码头采取的定价政策取决于其资本性质,纳什均衡是指两个集装箱码头都采用不匹配价格的政策或外资码头。在国家投资码头实行价格匹配政策;采取不匹配价格的政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号