• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>World multi-conference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics >Smart City Evaluation Framework (SMACEF): Is a Smart City Solution Beneficial for Your City?
【24h】

Smart City Evaluation Framework (SMACEF): Is a Smart City Solution Beneficial for Your City?

机译：智慧城市评估框架（SMACEF）：智慧城市解决方案是否对您的城市有利？

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There are currently presented "smart city" solutions from the biggest worldwide corporation through start-ups up to the universities. It is indisputable that some of them are for sure very interesting and beneficial for citizens and cities themselves. Nevertheless, there are too many provided solutions that make it very hard to evaluate which are really beneficial and which are not. A simple and understandable framework that would allow cities to evaluate a proposed smart city solution is currently missing. The aim of this paper is to provide an approach for evaluation of particular smart city solutions and to determine whether it is suitable and beneficial for the city. Cities are dynamic, non-linear, complex systems and the evaluation cannot be done by static and deterministic program in most cases, but dynamics and non-linearity of cities must be considered. While modeling is widely used in transportation or energy management, in the field of smart cities, no modeling approach has been used. In this paper, SMACEF (SMArt City Evaluation Framework) is proposed and its contribution is shown on a case study.
机译：从全球最大的公司到初创公司再到大学，目前都提供“智能城市”解决方案。毫无疑问，其中某些肯定对公民和城市本身非常有趣并有益。但是，提供的解决方案太多，很难评估哪些是真正有益的，哪些不是。当前缺少一个简单易懂的框架，该框架将允许城市评估提议的智能城市解决方案。本文的目的是提供一种评估特定智能城市解决方案的方法，并确定该解决方案是否适合并有益于城市。城市是动态的，非线性的，复杂的系统，大多数情况下无法通过静态和确定性程序进行评估，但是必须考虑城市的动态性和非线性。尽管建模已广泛应用于交通运输或能源管理中，但在智慧城市领域，尚未使用任何建模方法。在本文中，提出了SMACEF（SMArt城市评估框架），并在案例研究中显示了其贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号