• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International conference on collaboration and technology >Refraining Taxonomy Development in Collaborative Computing Research: A Review and Synthesis of CSCW Literature 2003-2010
【24h】

Refraining Taxonomy Development in Collaborative Computing Research: A Review and Synthesis of CSCW Literature 2003-2010

机译：抑制协作计算研究中的分类学发展：CSCW文献2003-2010的回顾与综合

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Technological evolution impacts the research and development of new solutions, as well as consumers' expectations and behaviors. With the advent of the new millennium, collaboration systems and technologies were introduced to support ordinary cooperative work and inter-dependent, socially and culturally mediated practices as integral units of everyday life settings. Nevertheless, existing classification systems are limited in scope to analyze technological developments and capture the intellectual structure of a field, understood as an abstraction of the collective knowledge of its researchers and their socially mediated activities. Ten years after the introduction of Mittleman et al.'s taxonomy, we build upon earlier work and adopt this classification scheme to provide a descriptive, taxonomy-based analysis of four distinct venues focused on collaborative computing research: ACM CSCW, ACM GROUP, ECSCW, and CRIWG. The proposal consists of achieving evidence on technical attributes and impacts towards characterizing the evolution of socio-technical systems via (and for) taxonomic modeling. This study can also constitute an important step towards the emergence of new, potentially more valid and robust evaluation studies combining Grounded Theory with alternative methods and techniques.
机译：技术演进影响新解决方案的研发以及消费者的期望和行为。随着新千年的到来，引入了协作系统和技术来支持普通的合作工作以及相互依存的，在社会和文化上介导的实践，并将其作为日常生活必不可少的组成部分。但是，现有的分类系统在分析技术发展和捕获某个领域的知识结构的范围上受到限制，这被理解为对该领域研究人员及其社会中介活动的集体知识的抽象。在引入Mittleman等人的分类法十年后，我们以较早的工作为基础，并采用此分类方案对基于协作计算研究的四个不同场所提供了基于分类法的描述性分析，它们分别是ACM CSCW，ACM GROUP，ECSCW和CRIWG。该提议包括通过分类模型（并为分类模型）获得关于技术属性及其对表征社会技术系统发展的影响的证据。这项研究也可能是迈向将扎根理论与替代方法和技术相结合的新的，可能更有效和强大的评估研究的重要一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号