• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>International conference on design theory and methodology;ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference >SHOULD TEAMS COLLABORATE DURING CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING DESIGN?: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
【24h】

SHOULD TEAMS COLLABORATE DURING CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING DESIGN?: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

机译：概念设计过程中团队应该合作吗？：一项实验研究

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A commonly held presumption is that the production of a team is superior to that of individual performance. However, in certain scenarios, such as during brainstorming activities and in configuration engineering design problems, it has been shown that individuals working alone are more effective than teams working together. This research considers whether the same outcomes hold for a more open-ended scenario, in conceptual engineering design. Thus, a behavioral study is run with freshman engineering students solving a conceptual design problem working in teams or individually. Results corroborate previous findings, showing that individuals outperform teams in the quality of their design solutions. One of the primary differences between individuals and group problem solving is the fact that groups need to verbalize to communicate ideas. Consequently, this study also analyzes how verbalization, which may be one disadvantage of team problem solving, affects the performance of individuals in this context of conceptual engineering design. Individuals who verbalize throughout problem solving, however, perform similarly to those who did not. Overall, the results from this study suggest that, individuals are still better performers and teams may not always be the optimal circumstance. Moreover, verbalization does not seem to act as a cognitive barrier to problem solving, and further investigation needs to be done to diagnose the potential impediments which put teams at a disadvantage to individuals during conceptual design.
机译：通常认为，团队的表现要优于个人表现。但是，在某些情况下，例如在集思广益活动期间和在组态工程设计问题中，已经证明，单独工作的个人比团队一起工作更有效。这项研究考虑了在概念工程设计中，是否有相同的结果适用于更开放的场景。因此，针对新生的工程系学生开展了一项行为研究，以解决团队或个人工作中的概念设计问题。结果证实了以前的发现，表明个人在设计解决方案的质量方面胜过团队。个人和小组解决问题之间的主要区别之一是，小组需要口头表达才能交流思想。因此，本研究还分析了口头表达（这可能是解决团队问题的一个缺点）如何在概念工程设计的背景下影响个人的绩效。在整个问题解决过程中口头表达的人的表现与未解决问题的人相似。总体而言，这项研究的结果表明，个人仍然是表现更好的人，团队不一定总是最佳的情况。而且，口头表达似乎并没有成为解决问题的认知障碍，需要做进一步的调查来诊断潜在的障碍，这些障碍在概念设计中使团队处于不利于个人的状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号