• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文会议>Canadian Society for Civil Engineering annual conference >A METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS THE COSTS AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS OF GREEN BUILDINGS FROM AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE
【24h】

A METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS THE COSTS AND FINANCIAL BENEFITS OF GREEN BUILDINGS FROM AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

机译：从行业角度评估绿色建筑成本和财务效益的方法

获取原文
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although practitioners and researchers in the Architectural, Engineering, and Constructionindustry recognize economic benefits to implementing sustainable practices in construction projects, theirperception of the extent, type, and size of those benefits is very different. Unlike practitioners, researchersbelieve there are significant long-term cost savings to implementing sustainable practices in the industry:savings that not only stem from energy efficiency in green buildings, but most importantly from health andproductivity improvements to indoor environments. Their view is that many green buildings could be builtat little to no additional cost. This comes at a time when practitioners remain skeptical about those claimsbecause of sustainable practices’ high initial costs, and uncertain long-term financial benefits. TheLeadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system, widely used in the industry tomeasure the sustainability of green buildings, attests to that difference in perceptions. 41% of LEEDpoints address energy efficiency (when energy savings only make up 11% of total whole life cost savingsaccording to researchers), and 24% address productivity and health efficiency (when healthy andproductivity savings represent up to 78% of total whole life cost savings). This paper is part of a study thatinvestigates practitioners’ perception of the theories, results, and conclusions advocated by researchersin an attempt to understand why many practitioners adopt the stance they do. This work in progressfocuses on presenting the survey that was conducted among LEED accredited professionals in Canadato analyze their views from a practical standpoint. The survey assesses more specifically practitioners’awareness and understanding of results advocated by the research community, and their confidence inthe accuracy of those results and their applicability to the industry. It also analyzes their confidence in thedesign, and layout of the current version of LEED used for New Construction in Canada.
机译：尽管建筑，工程和施工领域的从业人员和研究人员 行业认识到在建筑项目中实施可持续实践的经济利益， 对这些收益的程度，类型和规模的看法有很大不同。与从业者不同 相信在行业中实施可持续实践可以节省大量的长期成本： 节约不仅来自绿色建筑的能源效率，而且最重要的是来自健康和 提高室内环境的生产率。他们认为可以建造许多绿色建筑 几乎不需要任何额外费用。这是在执业者仍对那些主张持怀疑态度的时候 由于可持续做法的高昂初始成本以及不确定的长期财务收益。这 能源和环境设计（LEED）领导力评级系统，在行业中广泛用于 衡量绿色建筑的可持续性，证明这种看法上的差异。 LEED的41％ 要点涉及能源效率（当节能仅占整个生命周期总成本节省的11％时） 根据研究人员），有24％的受访者表示生产率和健康效率（健康和 生产力的节省最多占整个生命周期总成本节省的78％）。本文是一项研究的一部分， 研究从业人员对研究人员所提倡的理论，结果和结论的看法 试图理解为什么许多从业者采用他们的立场。这项工作正在进行中 重点介绍由加拿大LEED认证的专业人员进行的调查 从实际角度分析他们的观点。该调查更具体地评估了从业者的 对研究团体提倡的结果的认识和理解，以及他们对研究结果的信心 这些结果的准确性及其在行业中的适用性。它还分析了他们对 用于加拿大新建筑的LEED当前版本的设计和布局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号