首页> 外文会议>2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering >Evaluation Study on New Sorbents for Mercury in Coal-Fired Flue Gas
【24h】

Evaluation Study on New Sorbents for Mercury in Coal-Fired Flue Gas

机译:燃煤烟气中汞新吸附剂的评价研究

获取原文

摘要

More and more concern has been put on the mercury emitted from power stations burning coal because of its harm to human health. Both of the US EPA and European Commission have set regulations on the mercury emission from the electric utilities. China also pays more and more attention to the mercury emission and starts to sponsor the projects relative to the mercury emission and its control. Mercury emission control technologies may be divided into three classes, i.e., pre-combustion control, combustion control and flue gas control, among which the flue gas mercury removal technology is most widely used. The existed flue gas pollution control devices such as bag filter, electrostatic precipitator and wet FGD may remove the oxidized mercury from the flue gas. However, they have no obvious removal efficiency on the elemental mercury. The main direction in the development of new mercury removal technology is to transform the element of mercury into oxidized mercury and particulate-bounded mercury, which may be effectively removed. Before the sorbent is used to remove mercury from the flue gas, it needs to be evaluated on a lab-scale device, pilot-scale and full scale reactor or power station. The simulated flue gas composed of mercury vapors from the vapor generator and compressed air was used to conduct the experiment on removal of Hg in the sorbent evaluation test-bed in order to research different sorbents for the mercury removal efficiency. The experimental results indicate that the mercury removal efficiency of activated carbon is 60%; while fly ash is of low cost and its efficiency is limited. Unmodified fly ash adsorption efficiency is from 10% to 20%, and the specific surface area of modified fly ash has been increased a lot, and its adsorption efficiency can reach up to 25%, but it is far from the adsorption efficiency of activated carbon. The activated carbon is with higher mercury removal efficiency than fly ash, but its cost is very high. It is one of the st--udying directions to find high effective cheap sorbents.
机译:由于燃煤电厂对人体健康的危害,人们越来越关注燃煤电厂排放的汞。美国EPA和欧洲委员会都对电力公司的汞排放制定了法规。中国也越来越关注汞的排放,并开始赞助有关汞排放及其控制的项目。汞排放控制技术可分为三类,即燃烧前控制,燃烧控制和烟气控制,其中烟气除汞技术应用最广泛。现有的烟气污染控制装置,如布袋除尘器,静电除尘器和湿式烟气脱硫装置,可能会将烟气中的氧化汞去除。但是,它们对元素汞没有明显的去除效率。开发新的除汞技术的主要方向是将汞元素转化为可以有效去除的氧化汞和结合微粒的汞。在使用吸附剂去除烟道气中的汞之前,需要在实验室规模的设备,中试规模和全规模反应器或发电站进行评估。为了研究不同吸附剂的除汞效率,使用了由来自蒸汽发生器的汞蒸气和压缩空气组成的模拟烟气在吸附剂评估试验台上进行了汞的去除实验。实验结果表明,活性炭除汞效率为60%。粉煤灰价格低廉,效率有限。未经改性的粉煤灰的吸附效率为10%至20%,改性的粉煤灰的比表面积已大大增加,其吸附效率可达到25%,但与活性炭的吸附效率相差甚远。 。活性炭具有比粉煤灰更高的除汞效率,但是其成本非常高。它是 -- 寻找有效的廉价廉价吸附剂的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号