【24h】

What Do We Learn from Wind Uplift Tests of Roof Systems?

机译:我们从车顶系统的风提升测试中学到什么?

获取原文

摘要

There are several industry-accepted test protocols to evaluate the wind uplift resistance of commercial roofing systems (ASTM E1592, UL1897, UL580, FM 4470 etc.). These tests apply pneumatic pressure to full-scale roof specimens installed on a pressure chamber, and increasing the pressure until failure. The wind uplift design pressure is then determined by reducing the peak pressure by an accepted factor of safety (e.g. 1.5 or 2.0). A critical question to be asked on the results is the meaning or validity of these static test results when hurricane winds produce dynamic roof pressures that are constantly fluctuating in time and space? The presenter reviews similarities and limitations of common wind uplift test methods for standing seam metal panels, and mechanically attached single ply roofing systems that have been the industry-standard for many years and reports on research results for these systems. Most of the test protocols provide comparative results, absent any verifiable relationship to roof performance in actual wind storms.Of particular interest now is the determination of the wind design pressure for light-framed wood roof systems, for which there exists no industry-accepted test protocol. The fastener schedules and minimum fasteners included in current ICC building code today appear to be based on research conducted immediately after Hurricane Andrew. Recent experimental studies at the University of Florida revisited those studies and developed a new dynamic test protocol for wind uplift testing of roof sheathing panels. The results have shown inconsistency in previous tests and that static pressure testing of wood roofs may over-estimate their failure capacity when compared with dynamic pressure test methods. The presentation concludes with a proposal for standardizing the wind uplift testing of wood roof systems based on dynamic pressure fluctuations. The conclusion has far-reaching implications as similar modifications may be required to calibrate current static pressure test methodologies for commercial roof systems so that they for hurricane-prone locations.
机译:有几种行业认可的测试协议可以评估商用屋面系统的抗风隆性(ASTM E1592,UL1897,UL580,FM 4470等)。这些测试将气压施加到安装在压力室上的全尺寸屋顶样品上,并增加压力直到失效。然后通过将峰值压力降低一个可接受的安全系数(例如1.5或2.0)来确定风向提升设计压力。关于结果的一个关键问题是,当飓风产生的动态屋顶压力随时间和空间不断波动时,这些静态测试结果的含义或有效性?演讲者回顾了用于竖立接缝金属面板和机械连接的单层屋面系统的常见风阻测试方法的相似性和局限性,这些方法多年来一直是行业标准,并报告了这些系统的研究结果。大多数测试协议提供了可比较的结果,而在实际的暴风雨中却没有与屋顶性能的任何可验证的关系。 现在特别令人感兴趣的是确定轻型木屋顶系统的风设计压力,对此尚无行业认可的测试规程。当前,当前ICC建筑法规中包括的紧固件时间表和最低紧固件,似乎是基于安德鲁飓风后立即进行的研究得出的。佛罗里达大学最近进行的实验研究重新审视了这些研究,并开发了一种新的动态测试规程,用于屋顶护板的风振测试。结果表明以前的测试不一致,并且与动态压力测试方法相比,木屋顶的静压测试可能会高估其破坏能力。演讲最后提出了一项基于动态压力波动对木屋顶系统的风向提升测试进行标准化的建议。该结论具有深远的意义,因为可能需要对商用屋顶系统的当前静压测试方法进行校准以进行类似的修改,以使其易于发生飓风。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号